|
[Sponsors] |
March 29, 2011, 06:08 |
Stagnation point position error
|
#1 |
New Member
Jonas Schulze
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi
I'm computing a 2D-Airfoil in ANSYS CFX and have some trouble with the stagnation point. At an angle of attack of zero I'm expecting it to be right on the leading edge. But as you can see in the pictures below, it is positioned slightly on the suction side. I tried everything I can think of to get it right, but it just won't. Now a few words to my mesh and my boundaries. It is an ICEM hexa-mesh generated with blocking. The control voume around the airfoil is rectangular with 10 chord lengths distance from the leading edge to the inlet, 12 from chord to top and bottom of the CV and 40 chord lengths from the trailing edge to the outlet. You can also see two pictures of the mesh below. I espacially gave the nose of the airfoil a higher resolution to prevent the error I got now. The boundaries I'm using in CFX are a velocity inlet, translational periodicity at bottom an top, symmetry at both sides and an entrainment at the outlet. I already tried to use other boundaries, like entrainments at bottom and top, it didn't work either. The k-ome SST model is used for turbulence, I have an value of y+ below 1 at the wall. Now does anyone have an idea what I am doing wrong? Greetings and many thanks for your help! Jonas |
|
March 29, 2011, 09:07 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 727
Rep Power: 25 |
Would it not be the case that the stagnation point would only be always on the tip of the leading edge at zero angle of attack for a symmetrical aerofoil.
Since your aerofoil is un-symmetrical it would not have to be right on the LE tip since the more complex un-symmetrical aerofoil shape is having an un-symmetrical influence on the flowfield just upstream. Last edited by siw; March 29, 2011 at 09:16. Reason: Typo |
|
March 30, 2011, 20:10 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,655
Rep Power: 143 |
Stuart is right, the stagnation does not lie at the front tip for an asymetric airfoil. Have a look at the velocity vectors. That might explain what is going on a bit better.
|
|
March 31, 2011, 07:01 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Jonas Schulze
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
thanks for the helpful answers so far. the explanation why the stagnation point is not located at LE tip seems clear now. Still one question remains. why is the stagnation point in our simulation is on the suction side of the airfoil for zero angle of attack. If one considers simple model from potenial flow theory with distributed sources and sinks distributed and a vortex sheet on the camber line, wouldn't the stagnation point lie on the pressure side when the airfoil generates lift? thank you very much for your answers in advance cheers |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Compile calcMassFlowC | aurore | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 13 | March 23, 2018 08:43 |
c++ libraries and solver compiling | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Installation | 13 | February 3, 2012 18:43 |
compile errors of boundary condition "expDirectionMixed" | liying02ts | OpenFOAM Bugs | 2 | February 1, 2010 21:11 |
Version 15 on Mac OS X | gschaider | OpenFOAM Installation | 113 | December 2, 2009 11:23 |
How to get the max value of the whole field | waynezw0618 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | June 17, 2008 06:07 |