flow visualisation behind an impulsively started cylinder...

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

May 2, 2011, 01:17
flow visualisation behind an impulsively started cylinder...
#1
New Member

vetriselvan
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
Hi all,
I'm trying to compare the flow patterns of the early stage of development of the wake behind an impulsively started cylinder with the experimental results done by Bouard and Coutanceau 1980.
I'm not able to get the flow pattern at t*=1(as per the paper), even though I'm able to get the other flow patterns(but at different t*s).Could anyone please help in this regard??? I've attached the cfx simulation results.
Regards,
vetri
Attached Images
 comparision results re 5000.JPG (62.5 KB, 21 views) comparision results re 5000 2.JPG (72.7 KB, 18 views)

 May 2, 2011, 07:45 #2 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 12,638 Rep Power: 98

 May 9, 2011, 23:02 @ vetri #3 New Member     Mayank Ojha Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 22 Rep Power: 7 Can you tell me what are you exactly comparing your results to ??? I am also tying to do similar stuff. May be I can help if you explain your problem a bit in detail. -Mayank

 May 12, 2011, 00:59 #4 New Member   vetriselvan Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 8 Hi Mayank, Thanks for your interest in the problem... I'm trying to match the t* values and the flow pattern behind the cylinder.I could not match any of the t* values. But I'm able to get three patterns out of four as per the thumbnails posted. I'm calculating t(time step) values as follows. t=(t*)D/v where t-> time step input in cfx D->diameter of the cylinder v->velocity I'm calculating velocity input from Reynolds Number.If you need I could post the other boundary conditions also. Thanks again... Regards, vetri

 May 16, 2011, 01:57 @ Vetri #5 New Member     Mayank Ojha Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 22 Rep Power: 7 Hi, I did analysis over a stationary and a moving cylinder for quite a long time now. From what I understand is that the formation of vortex depends upon the numerical instability build as time passes. For example, If you have a single cylinder which is completely structured mesh, the vortex formation takes time, if you plot Cl vs time you realise it. On the other hand if you use a triangular (2-D) mesh, the vortex vormation takes place quicker because the mesh is not totally symmetrical about the horizontal. Also if your initial condition is something like Uinitial=c*y (c=some constant & y=domain ht.) the vortex shedding is much faster. When it comes to unstable solutions like vortex shedding from cylinders always measure factors like Pr. distribution, lift coeff, drag coeff only once the cylinder has reached the quasi steady state. I have never heard anyone comparing the time values from experiment to numerical simulations especially when it comes to vortex shedding/formation Hope this helps. -Mayank Ojha

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post goodegg Main CFD Forum 12 January 22, 2013 12:47 pXYZ Main CFD Forum 14 July 25, 2011 10:05 vmlxb6 CFX 17 May 16, 2011 02:29 yousef FLUENT 4 March 28, 2006 11:01 Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 2001 13:19

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:42.