|
[Sponsors] |
CFX v12 adding reattachment modification to sst model |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 13, 2011, 05:18 |
CFX v12 adding reattachment modification to sst model
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Duisburg, Germany
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello,
I need to add the reattachment modification to the Shear Stress Transport model, but I´m not sure how to do it. I assume i need to add some lines in the definition file.. can someone give me a clue how to do this? thanks a lot, ovechkin |
|
May 13, 2011, 06:56 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Duisburg, Germany
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 14 |
..got it. just add "SST Reattachment Modification = On" to Turbulence Model in Command Editor..
|
|
May 13, 2011, 06:59 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Raashid Baig
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 16 |
||
May 13, 2011, 07:08 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
I am not familiar with the reattachment model. In fact I did not even know it was in there. Do you know any details about it, or have any documentation on it?
|
|
May 13, 2011, 07:45 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Duisburg, Germany
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 14 |
Unfortunately I don't have any references/documentation on it. All I know is that the Reattachment Model accounts for an additional production of kinetic energy in seperated shear layers.
We use it for simulation of a turbulent premixed combustion process |
|
June 27, 2011, 15:50 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
|
It is basically related to fact that the baseline SST (original SST) predicts the larger separation bubble than the experimental values. This is due to the wrong prediction of reattachment point (boundary layer attachment at further downstream location). Therefore the RM modification was introduced in production term to account for the realistic separation bubble length and hence earlier attachment. It is to be noted that this limiter is not activated in the attached flow and hence base line sst is fully recovered.
Keeping in view above discussion, base line SST model has difficulties in predicting the stall point correctly and simulation often stops due to premature numerical stall. Best Regards Far |
|
March 4, 2014, 03:59 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 12 |
||
June 3, 2016, 19:51 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
ali
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 318
Rep Power: 17 |
folks,
I am using CFX v15.1 I cannot add this line to the command editor. I constantly receive this error: ERROR CCL validation failed with message: Error: Sub-object 'FLUID MODELS' is not allowed in / any ideas? any kind of help is much appreciated. |
|
June 4, 2016, 00:52 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
Why not just set it up in CFX-Pre and see what syntax it uses?
|
|
June 4, 2016, 15:35 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
ali
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 318
Rep Power: 17 |
CFX 12 and 15 which I have on my machine do not have this option in the advanced turbulence control. According to this post there should be a way to get away around this problem.
I use the same syntax that people have recommended here but I am getting the error I said. I suppose some people have already solved this problem. Really appreciate it if someone can help me out with this issue. Thanks, Ali |
|
June 5, 2016, 06:20 |
|
#11 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
My understanding is the options are available in CFD-Pre if your licensing allow those options. If you can't see the options then your licence does not support the advanced turbulence models and therefore putting it in via CCL will not help as the solver won't accept it.
|
|
June 5, 2016, 15:40 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
ali
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 318
Rep Power: 17 |
I do not think it is a license issue while I have the full license.
There should be some other way. The way this thread had initially started suggests that there is some alternate method for enabling this option using command editor. Any kind of help is much appreciated folks. Thanks, alinik |
|
June 5, 2016, 20:13 |
|
#13 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
If you look in the <CFX_ROOT>/etc/RULES file and search for the term it gives you some hints to the syntax. This might help you.
If that does not work post the CCL you are trying to use on the forum. |
|
June 5, 2016, 23:12 |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
ali
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 318
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks man for the info.
I checked the file and found the syntax in the file. It is actually the 8th line in the following text. in the command editor I write this line according to ovechkin and get the error I said. "SST Reattachment Modification = On" CONTEXT: SST Optional Parameter List = \ Eddy Viscosity, \ BC TKI Factor, \ BetaStar Coefficient, \ Compressible Production, \ A1 Coefficient, \ SST Reattachment Modification Optional Child List = \ BUOYANCY TURBULENCE, \ K OMEGA REGIME, \ K EPSILON REGIME, \ TRANSITIONAL TURBULENCE, \ PRODUCTION LIMITER, \ CURVATURE CORRECTION END |
|
June 5, 2016, 23:17 |
|
#15 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
Further down in the RULES file is where it shows the syntax of the specific element. It says the default value is "No". So I assume the values it is looking for is "Yes" or "No". That's just a guess.
|
|
June 5, 2016, 23:30 |
|
#16 |
Senior Member
ali
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 318
Rep Power: 17 |
This is what I found further down.
What shall I do? Shall I change the "No" to "Yes"? PARAMETER: SST Reattachment Modification Description = Determines whether the reattachement modification is \ used in the SST turbulence model Parameter Type = Logical Solver Name = LSSTRM Default = No |
|
June 5, 2016, 23:43 |
|
#17 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
This is a beta option and so is not documented anywhere. You have to figure it out.
In this case the easiest way to activate it is in CFX-Pre. Go to edit/options/general and select "enable beta features". Then go to the turbulence model options, select SST and the reattachment model will be visible under advanced turbulence control. |
|
June 7, 2016, 21:33 |
|
#19 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
Did he explain what is wrong with it?
|
|
June 8, 2016, 13:41 |
|
#20 |
Senior Member
ali
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 318
Rep Power: 17 |
Glenn
Thank you for your reply. I have enabled beta features but there is still no sign of SST Reattachment modifier. Any clue what to do? Sijal Thank you also for your comment. What do you suggest we should do if we want to control separation? Thanks, Ali |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low Reynolds Number SST Model | Josh | CFX | 41 | June 4, 2023 19:00 |
[ICEM] Proper way to name boundaries on 2D model for use in CFX? | RossFS | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | November 10, 2011 02:38 |
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model | YJZ | ANSYS | 1 | August 20, 2010 13:57 |
Turbulence model for CFX moving mesh | songxguan | CFX | 7 | June 28, 2009 21:05 |
Help: 2D model in CFX 5.5 | Dejun Jing | CFX | 1 | July 24, 2002 00:25 |