
[Sponsors] 
June 16, 2011, 09:52 
Zero equation turbulence model gives better result??

#1 
Member
Sanyo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 9 
Hello All,
I am doing flow simulation of 90 Deg. duct bend. Fluid is air at 500 Deg C. The area of duct upstream is low while that of downstream is quite more. Hence the flow separation is taking place. When I tried with ke, SST & RSM model, flow is packing towards the outer wall of the bend, resulting in high velocity in that part. Though this is practical, the separation region is overpredicted (Separation region is more in area). Hence the velocity values are also overpredicted (as more quantum of fluid is passing through less area). When I tried with zero equation turbulence model, though separation region is underpredicted; the velocity values are near to ground data (as flow is more distributed). This obviously confused me because as per my knowledge, 2 equation models are more accurate than zero equation model. I can not use zero equation model throughout the domain, as there are some turbulent dominant areas in the domain. Is there any intermediately accurate model between zero equation & SST? I would appreciate all the help I could get. Thanks in advance. Regards, Sanyo 

June 16, 2011, 19:34 

#2 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,831
Rep Power: 100 
I like the logic  zero equation is underpredicted, two equation is over predicted so a one equation model should be about right. Unfortunately it does not work that way. Predicting separation lengths is very tricky for turbulence models. I think your best bet would be to use SST and activate some of the advanced features, I think some of these include models to improve separation lengths. I cannot remember the names off hand, hopefully people can recall the options I have in mind.
If this does not work then you should consider DES, LES or SAS approaches. 

June 17, 2011, 08:37 

#3 
Member
Sanyo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 9 
Hi Glenn,
I would like to admit that your replies always help me a lot & would like to thank you for the efforts you take for CFD community. Probably I missed to convey my message clearly. I didnt want to say that zero equation model under predicts & hence its more accurate. I just found that two equation model or even RSM somehow was not able to capture the flow distribution at bend (where flow changes its direction at 90 Deg.) & giving the much different velocity values against ground data. On the other hand zero equation model gave the results much closer to ground data. I just wanted to know, if I was missing something in turbulence modeling. I also came across to the low Re Ke model of Fluent. I didnt find such model in CFX. I also read that Kw could be such model, but I didnt find the results promising. So I was wondering if such model could be implemented in CFX? Do you suggest to use the advance feature of SST such as "streamline curvature correction model"? In that case, how to determine the values of constants? Thank you for your help. Regards, Sanyo 

June 17, 2011, 08:42 

#4 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,831
Rep Power: 100 
I would not use any of the unusual turbulence models like low Re ke or kw unless you have a good reason to do so. The SST model is the best allpurpose turbulence model in CFX by far so use that one. Additionally the SST model has the extra options of things like curvature correction which the others do not.
No need to adjust the constants in the model. Leave them at the defaults. What Re is the duct flowing at? 

June 19, 2011, 05:22 

#5 
Member
Sanyo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 9 
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for the reply. The Re at duct is 9.5e+5. Regards, Sanyo 

June 19, 2011, 06:41 

#6 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,831
Rep Power: 100 
OK, mid level turbulence. SST should be as good as anything for this flow regime.


June 21, 2011, 09:30 

#7 
Member
Sanyo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 9 
Hi Glenn,
Sorry for late reply. Can you suggest what model to be used if Re is around or less than 35000? In my case, for another set of operating conditions, Re is 37000. Thanks in advance. Regards, Sanyo 

June 21, 2011, 20:08 

#8 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,831
Rep Power: 100 
SST is the best general purpose turbulence model.


June 22, 2011, 03:32 

#9 
Member
Sanyo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 9 
Thanks a lot.


June 24, 2011, 16:34 

#10 
New Member
Joseph Tipton
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8 
I'm not sure if this will be helpful to your situation or not, but I experienced what sounds like a similar problem with turbulent flow over a backward facing step. The reattachment point didn't correspond to experiment and, upon further inspection, the crosssection flow profiles were "off" as well. The problem turned out to be convergencerelated. The default RMS value of 1E4 was not sufficient for achieving a fully converged solution.


June 26, 2011, 10:58 

#11 
Member
Sanyo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 9 
Hi jtipton2,
Thank you very much for your reply. I will definitely try to achieve more stringent convergence norm. Regards, Sanyo 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
SimpleFoam case with SpalartAllmaras turbulence model implemented  nedved  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  2  November 30, 2014 23:43 
ke turbulence model and energy equation  Blob  Main CFD Forum  0  May 29, 2009 08:35 
Reynolds transport, turbulence model, etc  Beginner  Main CFD Forum  1  January 7, 2009 06:36 
Stabilizing turbulence equation in channel flow  Biga  Main CFD Forum  5  March 22, 2005 21:06 
Sinclair Model + secondary turbulence  Yi  FLUENT  0  October 26, 2001 13:37 