CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Combination of simple Photometric and CFD analysis

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 29, 2011, 03:47
Default Combination of simple Photometric and CFD analysis
  #1
New Member
 
Dmitry
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 14
Dimon is on a distinguished road
Brief description of a problem.
I have very simple chemical reactor with water flow lighted by flash lamps. (see pic.). There is numerous of small bodies inside the flow. I'm modeling energy absorbed (doze) by this bodies during passing the reactor. My task is to improve geometry of the reactor to increase the doze.

I ask for advice for modeling the light source. During modelling I find very strange result for doze, there was no big difference how far from the light source small body is. I have create simple model (pic 2) several spheres one of them was source of radiation. I see all the spheres absorb equal energy, but the distance between them was different.

I use Discrete Transfer model. Radiation source is isotropic. Absorption is measured by using Absorbed Radiation Flux function.

Thanks in advanced
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Task.jpg (28.9 KB, 10 views)
Dimon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2011, 06:45
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
If the outer wall is reflective then the radiation will be uniform and no matter where it is it will get the same dose. What is your outer wall boundary condition for radiation?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2011, 08:35
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Dmitry
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 14
Dimon is on a distinguished road
Boundary condition for wall:
Wall Emissivity - 0
Diffuse fraction - 1

But in my second model (pic.2) I expected to see inverse-square law, because there is no any walls except spheres, all others was opening(material - air).
Dimon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2011, 08:44
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
But what radiation condition did you apply to the opening? I think you want to apply 0K blackbody temp so no radiation comes back from the opening.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2011, 09:11
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Dmitry
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 14
Dimon is on a distinguished road
Thank you for idea with blackbody temperature at the opening, I've forgot about it.
Dimon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37.