CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Infinitely Long Bearing - Linear Wedge

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 7, 2011, 05:52
Default Infinitely Long Bearing - Linear Wedge
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
Adam Riese is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I try to simulate some principal Bearing Problems and am quite new to CFX.
As a test case I chose the Infinitely Linear Wedge, i.e. a moving plate at the bottom and an inclined upper plate with an inlet 2 microns high and an outlet 1 micron high. For this case an analytical solution to the reynolds equation exisits, resulting in a maximum pressure of 50 MPa.
I modeled a thin 3D structure 0.1 micron thick and meshed it with hex elements.
My problem is that the solution does not fit to the analytical one. I started a parameter study. The only influence I recognized is the fluid timescale control. Choosing an automatic timescale with a specified lenght scale of 1 micron and a timescale factor of 0.2 produced the best results (37 MPa, velocity profile qualitatively correct) . Further reducing the length scale or timescale factor results in an error. I tried to define a physical timescale but also with very small values the results were insufficient.
I recognized that it is important to have a slow convergence rate as then the results get closer to the analytical solution. But the convergence is still decreasing significantly when reaching the RMS residual target of 1e-6.
Has anyone some hints for me in solving such a thin film flow problem?
Thanks in Advance.
Adam Riese is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2011, 19:03
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,830
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2011, 05:02
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
Adam Riese is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the link. But I already tried the points mentioned there.
I now additionally raised the mesh density in flow direction much more and then the solution gets a bit better. Is it possible that CFX can only cope with cube like elements? The other meshes have long element sides in flow direction. Is Fluent the better choice for such elements?
Adam Riese is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2011, 07:01
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,830
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
It is likely your domain has very high aspect ratio elements as the wedge is so thin. In this case, yes, hexahedral elements will be significantly better than tets. Also double precision might help.

I know of no difference between CFX and Fluent in being able to handle high aspect ratio elements.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2011, 07:22
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
Adam Riese is on a distinguished road
The mesh contains only hex-Elements (20 over the gap, 200 or more in flow direction and 1 element in symmetry direction). I tried double precission showing nearly no effect.
Thanks for your help.

Last edited by Adam Riese; July 8, 2011 at 07:44.
Adam Riese is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
solution diverges when linear upwind interpolation scheme is used subash OpenFOAM 0 May 29, 2010 01:23
Problems in compiling paraview in Suse 10.3 platform chiven OpenFOAM Installation 3 December 1, 2009 08:21
IdeasUnvToFoam Bug amp Fix benru OpenFOAM Bugs 42 November 13, 2009 08:59
OpenFOAM-1.5-dev svn revision 1438: libOpenFOAM does not compile in SP 4xF OpenFOAM Bugs 3 October 16, 2009 05:35
Missing math.h header Travis FLUENT 4 January 15, 2009 12:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16.