CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Rigid body

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 7, 2011, 13:21
Default Rigid body
  #1
New Member
 
stefano rigosi
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
stefano rigosi is on a distinguished road
Dear all,
I am dealing with floating body in the real sea state condition, which means irregular wave, high unsteadiness and wave-body interaction.
Anybody knows how CFX 13 computes the dynamic behaviour of a floating body??
Does it takes into account non-linear damping coefficient, the added mass of inertia and so on.
I would like to have some more information about this new topic, since in the Help it is not well explained.


I have got another easy question. Why when dealing with water free surface and two phases it is better to implement SST as turbulent model instead of k-e??

Thanks
stefano rigosi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2011, 19:02
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,672
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
CFX has a 6DOF solver. For details see the documentation.

What is the non-linear damping coefficient you refer to? The body is coupled to the fluid around it. There is no damping coefficients, the damping is modelled directly.

Mass - obviously, yes this is modelled.

Free surface and SST/k-e - I do not know where you got that one from. SST is generally a more widely applicable turbulence model than k-e, but that applies to single phase models as well.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2011, 15:32
Default
  #3
New Member
 
stefano rigosi
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
stefano rigosi is on a distinguished road
Dear Glenn,

Thank you for your quick answer.
Since I did the tutorial of a floating buoy in CFX13 I found that they suggest to use SST turbulence model, but they do not justify this choice.
I think, it is more robust for the free surface modelling, but I am not sure.

Moreover, I have some problem in my simulations. I used a timestep of 0,01 sec. and when I monitor the force and the torque acting on the rigid body I found very changeable values, such as +100 and -20 between two timesteps.
What can I do apart from reducing the timesteps, that leads to much longer simulations??

Thanks,
stefano rigosi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2011, 06:38
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,672
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
No, SST is recommended as the general purpose turbulence model. This recommendation is general, not specific to free surface models.

The rapidly oscillating forces suggest the 6DOF solver is not happy. Sometimes this can be helped with a smaller timestep, but there may be options in the solver to help damp oscillations. I don't know, I am not very familiar with the 6DOF solver.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rigid body Birkov CFX 4 May 25, 2012 06:26
Turbulent solver rigid body mechanics philippose OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 53 July 16, 2011 13:35
Rigid Body State Variables in Solid Immersed Simulation Hamidreza CFX 1 October 19, 2009 06:14
rigid body motion antonello FLUENT 3 July 28, 2004 03:25
What type of boundary for a moving rigid body? Ryan FLUENT 5 April 13, 2004 11:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21.