CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

buoyancy turbulence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 12, 2011, 04:33
Default buoyancy turbulence
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Switzerlan
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Baillifa is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am simulating a fire in an enclosed room. As I have to evaluate the development of the fire I'm doing a transient simulation.
My problem is that when I introduce the buoyancy turbulence term in the k-epsilon turbulence equation the simulation crashes (no linear solution for the mass equation). Using the same setup without the buoyancy turbulence the simulation works fine. Could it be that my mesh is not good enough? Should I reduce the transient time step (currently 1 second)?

Any input would be much appreciated!

Regards,

Marc
Baillifa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2011, 18:52
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,937
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
All the buoyancy term in the turbulence equation does is add a new production term due to buoyancy effects. It is a secondary effect, so your simulation should still be close without it.

But to get it to run I would try the usual things - smaller timestep, double precision numerics, better mesh quality.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 13, 2011, 02:26
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Switzerlan
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Baillifa is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your answer!

I am trying to improve the mesh and reducing the timestep. But as it is quite a large domain and I have to simulate 1800 seconds, I have to find the largest timestep possible. A further problem is that the linear solution problem appears randomly. Last time it appeard after it already simulated 180s.
That's why in parallel I'm looking for parameters I entered which could be incompatible:

- I added both buoyancy turbulence production and dissipation, using the default parameters. As the speed is low in my model, in considered Thermal Energy rather than total Energy. Could this be a problem?

- I used the high resolution advection scheme, First order solver for Turbulence numerics, and coefficient loops for timescale control.

- I used the "Second Order Backward Euler" as transient scheme, with timesteps between 0.5 and 1 s.

Could it be that one of these settings cause problem when the buoyancy terms are activated?

Thanks in adavance for any input!
Baillifa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 13, 2011, 19:43
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,937
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Sounds like you have a numerical stability problem with the buoyancy turbulence production. Simplifying the model (thermal energy versus total energy) can help this.

You might have to do smaller timesteps than your range. If that is what is required, that is what you have to do regardless of the implications on run time.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
buoyancy, turbulence

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
build your own turbulence model with buoyancy Thomas Baumann OpenFOAM 11 November 23, 2009 09:53
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 09:52
Buoyancy Turbulence Chilli83 CFX 3 April 14, 2009 20:28
Buoyancy turbulence Atit CFX 0 May 13, 2007 11:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:55.