CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

K-omega SST transition fully turbulent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 16, 2011, 08:34
Default K-omega SST transition fully turbulent
  #1
PvS
New Member
 
Paul
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
PvS is on a distinguished road
Hello,


I have read almost every thread about Yplus and K-W SST model. I have set my wall function to Automatic with enabled Transitional Turbulence to Fully Turbulent.

Now could I just ask one simple question

Does my Yplus has to be less than 1 (y+<1) when the automatic wall function is on! and how many Inflations layers must I use near the wall for my mesh?

Im dealing with a Reynolds Number of approximatley 5000
my hydraulic diameter is about 0.003m


If I have to give 25-30 inflation layers to make the simulation more accurate what is the recommended growth rate and the inflation layer option

1) first layer thickness?
2) LAst Aspect ratio?
3)Total Thickness?


I know The SST model is based on the k-omega model and has the same automatic wall treatment
Improves on standard k-omega model, which proves too sensitive to freestreamturbulence.
Accounts for transport of turbulent shear stress and gives highly accurate predictions of the onset and the amount of flow separation
This is a good default choice

Could somebody please clear this for me because I've been hearing that if you re using automatic wall function you do not need to be worrying about Yplus But however when check my Yplus in CFX post or when I monitor my Wall plus on my geomerty I get y+=22 and when I dont put any inflation layers the solution oscillates and does not reach the residual criteria.

So please help!

Last edited by PvS; July 16, 2011 at 08:52.
PvS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2011, 06:29
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,806
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Your mesh does not have to be y+<1 but you probably have not achieved an accurate simulation if it is not the case. The transition model requires a finer mesh than the fully turbulent model.

The turbulence transition model is tuned for external flows, primarily airfoils. You seem to be using it for internal flows. While it is the best model around for transition, be aware that it might not be so accurate for internal flows.

I grow my inflation layers at 1.05 for rough results and 1.02 for more demanding results when turbulence modelling is critical.
PvS likes this.
ghorrocks is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models Jade M Main CFD Forum 12 June 2, 2015 13:16
k-omega SST simulation of turbulent flow around a circular cylinder DanM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 16 December 12, 2012 14:39
Boundary Conditions for k omega SST dancfd OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 June 9, 2011 23:25
Missing Information in SST Transition Model Formulation Josh CFX 2 September 14, 2010 11:49
to LANGTRY ROBIN :help, hypersonic transition SST ben akih CFX 0 September 21, 2006 04:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37.