CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFX iteration problem.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 3, 2011, 21:26
Question CFX iteration problem.
  #1
New Member
 
windhair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 8
windhair is on a distinguished road
when I run a multi-phase (continuous fluid - dispersed fluid) simulation, the RMS seems very nice at the beginning, until to step 197, it suddently crashed with a overflow error, what may be the reason of such strange situiation ?

(BTW, the PC running the simulation has no internet connection, I can not upload the RMS pictures here.)

thank for you reply in advance.
windhair is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2011, 01:11
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,937
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Could be anything - but in general something has caused a gross numerical divergence despite being previously stable.

It could be physical - ie a shock wave has hit something or the first bubble has reached the exit boundry condition, or it could be numerical - ie a start-up smoothing parameter has turned off and now your simulation is unstable.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2011, 10:37
Default
  #3
New Member
 
windhair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 8
windhair is on a distinguished road
I'm running a fluid-solid Euler-Euler simulation, with an artificial viscosity as discribed in document. Another supporter recommand me to use EDEM model in fluent, but we did not buy this license, will that special model give a more stable simulation? what is the best feature of EDEM?
windhair is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2011, 18:44
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,937
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
As you have not descirbed your application I have not idea if your eular-eular approach is appropriate. EDEM is a very different approach as it is lagrangian particle tracking. Consider EDEM if you want to include more advanced particle interactions like maximum packing, particle collision, particle friction etc. Of course to use these advanced particle interactions you need to know what the maximum packing, collision physics and/or friction coefficients are for your particles!

I have no experience in coupling EDEM with CFX so cannot vouch for its stability. But I have no reason to suspect it would not be stable.

But I would not go to EDEM simply because your current approach is unstable. There is something you are doing with the current approach which is causing the problem, so work out what it is and fix it.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2011, 12:06
Default
  #5
New Member
 
windhair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 8
windhair is on a distinguished road
thanks, i 'm still working on that. My application is about the mixing processing of very small particle, 0.1mm diameter, with a average density around 2000kg.m^-3, blowing by air. the gravity is also included. In the mixing , VF of the particle is about 50%, is this suitable to choice Euler-Euler model with a assumption to set the particle phase as a dispersed fluid, and set a artificial viscosity for it? I find some comment on such condition in CFX document. Under such situition, will the reference density for the buoyancy model play a sensentive rule in the simulation?
windhair is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2011, 18:29
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,937
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I do not have much experience with that exact setup so cannot say. All I can say is make sure you carefully validate your models and compare against quality experimental data.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2011, 04:20
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 7
altano is on a distinguished road
Windhair,

I got same problem on my previous work.

How many particles represent your solid phase? Have you tried changing number of positions?
altano is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2011, 03:50
Question
  #8
New Member
 
windhair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 8
windhair is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by altano View Post
Windhair,

I got same problem on my previous work.

How many particles represent your solid phase? Have you tried changing number of positions?
actually, using particle model is not really proper for my case, where the flo domain is about 2mX2mX2m, and the particle size is about 0.1mm, the total volume fraction of the particle is 70%, particle simulation is not suitable for such case as described in the CFX document. Thus a virtual fluid need to be configured as suggested by the CFX document.
windhair is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem in coupling CFX and Ansys for fluid-thermal sim. Jordi CFX 15 June 6, 2015 00:45
Ansys Workbench (CFX) bucket problem njsavage CFX 1 April 30, 2009 09:51
Ansys CFX bucket problem njsavage Main CFD Forum 1 April 30, 2009 09:48
Fan Modelling Problem in CFX Jenny CFX 8 September 11, 2007 13:59
CFX 4.4 installation problem Pandu Sattvika CFX 1 December 1, 2001 05:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00.