CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Rotating Frame of Reference

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 24, 2011, 12:16
Question Rotating Frame of Reference
  #1
New Member
 
Ian S.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Norflow is on a distinguished road
Hey community!

Firstly, I would like to say what a great resource this is and how thankful I am to be a part of it. I am a junior mechanical engineer, and aspiring hydraulic engineer. I am relatively new to CFX software but have a good foundation of theory behind fluid dynamics. I will continue to post my findings and questions and hopefully they can be of help to others that have relative issues.

I have a multi-domain, steady state simulation with 3D geometry of a water passage (one domain - stationary) imported from SW and inside this geometry is a 5 blade kaplan turbine (second domain - rotating). It has meshed well and I have specified inlet (mass flow-rate) and outlet (static pressure) conditions. I am interested in any areas of cavitation and a preliminary efficiency that I can compare to a physical model test that was performed.

I am wondering, initially, is this the right approach? I am trying to model a complete water passage from intake to draft tube with a rotating turbine inside it. However, the walls are also part of the rotating domain and I'm not sure if that's correct to simulate. Should I have a counter-rotating wall in this domain?

Any help is more than appreciated!

Thanks
Norflow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 18:41
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,598
Rep Power: 76
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
There is a FAQ in the CFX documentation on rotating machinery which will help you. Have you read it? That would be the best place to start.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 16:31
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Ian S.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Norflow is on a distinguished road
@Ghorrocks,

I have read most of the User Guides for Mesh, Pre, Solver, and Post. While all of them are great resources, tutorials and examples don't deal with large area simulations or only deal with water-to-blade passages in a symmetric nature. Also, I am not using turbo mode, as I have modeled only the water passage as a single part by taking existing geometry and creating a internal "mold" of the cavity.

I have performed a simulation and had convergence but I don't believe my results are accurate. I have attached a .jpeg of the velocity streamline through the water passage. My concern is that my stationary domains aren't properly effected by my rotating domain. Any ideas?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FLOW.jpg (89.2 KB, 55 views)
Norflow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 22:03
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,598
Rep Power: 76
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
What is not properly affected by it?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 29, 2011, 13:22
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Ian S.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Norflow is on a distinguished road
Firstly, the blades are spinning in the wrong direction, which is quite evident from the uploaded jpeg image, and my next simulation will be corrected. What I am concerned with is the fact that there is no residual swirl in streamlines as the flow leaves the rotating domain and a sudden change in velocity. Why is that?
Norflow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 29, 2011, 18:39
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,598
Rep Power: 76
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
the blades are spinning in the wrong direction
Looks OK to me. I think you are confused by the frames of reference. Plot velocity vectors using "velocity in stationary frame". Then you will see what you expect.

Should write an FAQ on this, this question has been asked many times.

Quote:
there is no residual swirl in streamlines
For low losses good turbomachinery design tries to minimise swirl in the outlet. This suggests your design is functioning well! Operate it off the design point and I bet you will get lots of swirl.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2011, 08:47
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Ian S.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Norflow is on a distinguished road
Okay, I'll give it a try. Thanks so much for your valuable feedback, I really appreciate it.
Norflow is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cavitation, multi domain, rotating domain, turbine, water passage

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Second Derivative Zero - Boundary Condition fu-ki-pa OpenFOAM 10 May 1, 2014 16:26
question about governing equation in CFX using rotating/non rotating reference frame rystokes CFX 0 January 12, 2010 06:14
Error with Wmake skabilan OpenFOAM Installation 3 July 28, 2009 00:35
OpenFOAM on MinGW crosscompiler hosted on Linux allenzhao OpenFOAM Installation 127 January 30, 2009 19:08
G95 + CGNS Bruno Main CFD Forum 1 January 30, 2007 00:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:42.