CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

How to judge convergence?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 29, 2011, 10:22
Default How to judge convergence?
  #1
New Member
 
Akash
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 5
akash_max is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

How are you all doing! I believe doing awesome!

I have a problem in understanding the convergence of my problems. I solve the model without cavitation and then with caviatation. I set my RMS residuals to 1e-06. I check for

1) Mass and Momentum to be below 1e-06
2) Turbulence to be below at least 1e-4
3) Volume fractions to be below 1e-4
4) Imbalance of all and most important is mass imbalance and P-volum imbalance almost near to zero
5) Flow - In - Mass boundary flow on in(viscor) and P-Mass boundary flow on in to that of Out - Mass boundary flow on Out (viscor) and P-Mass boundary flow on Out to be equal over the number of iterations.

Kindly let me know whether I am right or please correct me if I am wrong.

My Imbalance especially mass imbalance and P-volum imbalance oscillates at zero between 10 to 22 and I stop it at zero, when it has run long

Please some on solve me or suggest me the better way.

Best Regards
Akash A V
akash_max is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 29, 2011, 14:10
Default
  #2
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,910
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
seems to be fine. but as suggested by ghorrocks time to time " do the sensitivity analysis"
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 29, 2011, 14:15
Default
  #3
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,910
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
mass imbalance and P-volum imbalance oscillates at zero between 10 to 22
What do you mean by 10 to 22?

Last edited by Far; September 29, 2011 at 14:17. Reason: wrong command in latex
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 29, 2011, 16:11
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Akash
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 5
akash_max is on a distinguished road
Dear Sir,

Thanks for your kind response.

I usually see to that all the residuals are below the set value(1e-06), but some times I even compromise at 1e-04.

Regarding the mass imbalance and P-volum imbalance oscillates (+/-) at zero between 10 to 22% and then flantens up to zero.

I wanted to ask that, is it right thing to stop the solution when the residuals have come down the set value and before it converges fully. Or if not should we allow it run still it come to halt.

Are there some kind of divergence and bisection graphs where upon we can make out the solution is converging or not.

please let me know on this. As this is making me confused with when to stop the solution, although the residuals have come below the set values(1e-06)

Once again thank you!

Best Regards
Akash A V
akash_max is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 29, 2011, 16:17
Default
  #5
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,910
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
better to give some time, to be on the safe side, to see that solution does not change for next 20-50 iterations, If you have difficulty in getting the residuals below 1e-04, try to reduce the time step
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 29, 2011, 17:50
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,668
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
My preferred approach is to do a sensitivity analysis. Compare the results of a parameter you care about (eg drag, maximum pressure, whatever is important in your analysis) with a range of convergence tolerances. When the parameter asymptotes out to within a tolerance you are happy to accept then that defines your convergence critereon.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 30, 2011, 13:51
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Akash
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 5
akash_max is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

Thanks a lot. I am doing out sensitive test, with the mesh as well as the parameters. I see with change in the mesh size and the values things change horribly and a time I felt, what ever I did was all crap.

But soon realized that nothing much changes with these changes, only certain output changes but need to again get hold upon it based uopon sensitive tests. I will stick on to 1E-06 and is the best approach.

Reduce all residuals below 1e-06 and see to the imbalane graph and check all variable are at atleast 0.1% +/- between zero. Check other parameters like mass flow in and going out (must be all most the same) and the mass viscor, turbulence Rms all below 1e-04.

Send me your email ID I will send the convergence graphs

Please correct me if I am wrong

Best Regards
Akash A v
akash_max is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 30, 2011, 14:06
Default
  #8
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,910
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
please provide the convergence plots here, so that other users may be benefited by your work
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 30, 2011, 14:07
Default
  #9
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,910
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
for mass flow rate, try to get the 0.01% or less
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 3, 2011, 17:47
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,668
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
for mass flow rate, try to get the 0.01% or less
No Far, you cannot prescribe general convergence recommendations. That figure might work fine in your work but this is a totally different case so it is likely to be far tighter than is required. The only rational approach is to do a sensitivity analysis and establish what this specific simulation needs.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2011, 00:04
Default
  #11
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,910
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
it is likely to be far tighter than is required
So 0.01% is tighter than required? I always enforce this condition, because I read in many paper that mass flow rate imbalance should be equal to or less than 1e-04.Though I never checked that what happens if criteria is 1e-03 or even 1e-02.

PS. In external aerodynamics CFD I put less stringent convergence criteria than for the internal flows, specially for turbo-machinery
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2011, 00:09
Default
  #12
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,910
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
only rational approach is to do a sensitivity analysis and establish what this specific simulation needs
I totally agree with the recommendation. I should rather say that every body who is involved CFD analysis must do the sensitivity analysis as it has two advantages.

1. Saves alot time in future

2. Confidence level in results is higher, and every body shall trust your CFD, even yourself!!!!!
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2011, 01:12
Default
  #13
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,668
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Your 0.01% was actually the mass residual? From your initial comment I suspected you were talking about a mass imbalance. 1e-4 is a loose residual (but often OK for design purposes) but 1e-4 as a mass imbalance is very tight.

But again, the best approach is to do a sensitivity study and find out how tight your exact case requires.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2011, 02:07
Default
  #14
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,910
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
but 1e-4 as a mass imbalance is very tight.
Yes I always try to get this or even 1e-05 as mass imbalance

Quote:
1e-4 is a loose residual (but often OK for design purposes)
Yes it is loose residual. But I always try for 1e-07 even 1e-08, but alteast I ensure that residaul for mass, momentum, energy and turbulence quantities are alteast 1e-06
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convergence Centurion2011 FLUENT 24 May 9, 2015 08:02
Force can not converge colopolo CFX 13 October 4, 2011 22:03
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis nasdak CFX 2 June 29, 2009 01:17
Defect correction and convergence ganesh Main CFD Forum 4 June 30, 2006 14:20
How to judge convergence at each timestep by LES ? lcw FLUENT 0 May 25, 2006 13:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:34.