CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Questions

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 18, 2011, 04:58
Default Questions
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 9
Zaktatir is on a distinguished road
Hello Guys,

I am trying to model droplet entrainment by gas from water film and the deposition of this droplets too.

My question is how to model the drag between water droplet and water film. I am applying the three- fluid model approach and using CFX. I found only stuff dealing with droplet interaction time and turbulent effects which are difficult to implement in to this commercial code.

Reentrainment (deposition) plays too a very important role: at this moment Entrainment is well solved but because my droplet s becoming bigger they move under the water film.



thx Rebecca
Zaktatir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2011, 06:16
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,592
Rep Power: 90
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Can you show an image of what you are trying to do? I do not understand yet.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2011, 07:53
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 9
Zaktatir is on a distinguished road
I am trying to model the onset of droplet entrainment in stratified wavy counter current flow.

Droplet deposition on the water film should be taken in to account.

I am defining: Air (continuous), Water (continuous) Water-Droplets (disperse)...


If my droplets become bigger or if i have a big amount of them they fall down and go under the water film (Several trial to increase physically the Deposition rate don't lead to better modeling)

I am doubting, if its due to the euler-euler approach because Water-Film phase as well as droplet-phase have the same density...

Thx Rebecca
Zaktatir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2011, 17:01
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,592
Rep Power: 90
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
My question is how to model the drag between water droplet and water film.
I do not understand this question. Why is there drag between the water droplet and the water film? I would have thought that if a water droplet touches a water film they would merge. So I do not see how drag is relevant.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2011, 02:21
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 9
Zaktatir is on a distinguished road
In the Euler-Euler Approach i should define that drag coefficient between the phases even though the droplet merge to the water film. My problem again is i cannot model that merging (deposition ) phenomena very good. Still have droplets which tend to flow under the water film..

Jessica
Zaktatir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2011, 06:47
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,592
Rep Power: 90
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Oh I see, the drops and the continuous bit are different phases.

Not sure how you would do this, it is a tricky model. Just a thought - can you use particle tracking rather than the dispersed eularian phase?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2011, 07:28
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 9
Zaktatir is on a distinguished road
Droplets are produced in the domain and are not introduced from a nozzle or something.. that s particle tracking is not welcome.... i thought about defining a relative density of the droplets (assuming that they have a middle density) in order to keep that merging problem out (e.g defining an artificial buoyancy force between the water phase and the droplet phase).

Jessica
Zaktatir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2011, 17:36
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,592
Rep Power: 90
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
You can produce particles as needed here, you don't need nozzles or inlets.

But whether you do it by eularian or lagrangian approach you are going to have to do some development work to get it working. There is no simple approach to my knowledge.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2011, 09:07
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Julio Mendez
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Greensboro, U.S.A
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 8
juliom is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to juliom
Wow I see it is a very complex simulation.
Are you using the Euler-Euler model (particle) model?
I think you might Use the MUSIG model, since you can work with different particles and diameter, and couple them via differente terms.!!
juliom is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
possible interview questions atturh Main CFD Forum 1 February 21, 2012 09:53
Questions for a species transport problems (snapshots attached) aleisia FLUENT 2 October 9, 2011 04:40
LES basic and simple questions. dshawul Main CFD Forum 0 October 4, 2010 10:56
NACA0012 Validation Case Questions ozzythewise Main CFD Forum 3 August 3, 2010 14:39
Fluent FAQ Started - Fill it With Questions Jonas Larsson FLUENT 0 September 12, 2005 10:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59.