CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

ERROR #001100279 - CFX 13 - transient run

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 6, 2011, 12:05
Default ERROR #001100279 - CFX 13 - transient run
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
Zigainer is on a distinguished road
Hey,

I just started my transient calculation and it run quite good.
I calculated 9 setps successfully (with normal residuals) but in my 10th timestep I get the following error after 12 of 15 iterations:

Hope you can help me. Could this be, because somebody else started a calculation on the same machine and it run out of memory?

----
edit: only chance from a previous (running without error) one is Turbulence Numerics : Option : First Order -> High Resolution

----


+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. |
| Message: |
| c_fpx_handler: Floating point exception: Invalid Operand |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. |
| Message: |
| Stopped in routine FPX: c_fpx_handler |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| An error has occurred in cfx5solve: |
| |
| The ANSYS CFX solver exited with return code 1. No results file |
| has been created. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

End of solution stage.

Last edited by Zigainer; December 6, 2011 at 12:24.
Zigainer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2011, 19:47
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,671
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Been asked a million times, I really should write an FAQ on this.

Floating point error means your simulation has diverged. You need to improve numerical stability. To fix it consider smaller time steps, better initial conditions, tighter convergence and lots of other options.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2011, 03:48
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
Zigainer is on a distinguished road
Hey,

I can't believe that my calculation diverged.

Here is the part of the out-file:

================================================== ====================
| Timestepping Information |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Timestep | RMS Courant Number | Max Courant Number |
+----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 5.0000E-02 | 999.99 | 999.99 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

================================================== ====================
TIME STEP = 10 SIMULATION TIME = 5.0000E-01 CPU SECONDS = 5.386E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 1 CPU SECONDS = 5.386E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 1.14 | 1.6E-05 | 5.9E-03 | 1.0E-01 ok|
| V-Mom | 1.17 | 5.5E-05 | 1.9E-02 | 1.2E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 1.13 | 2.6E-05 | 7.6E-03 | 1.4E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 0.91 | 1.3E-07 | 1.9E-05 | 10.2 6.0E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 0.85 | 3.3E-03 | 1.5E-01 | 3.0E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 1.19 | 8.2E-04 | 2.0E-02 | 6.2 3.0E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 1.19 | 3.0E-05 | 8.8E-03 | 6.2 6.4E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 0.90 | 5.2E-06 | 2.1E-03 | 7.6 4.6E-05 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 2 CPU SECONDS = 5.425E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 0.83 | 1.4E-05 | 2.9E-03 | 1.1E-01 ok|
| V-Mom | 1.29 | 7.1E-05 | 1.7E-02 | 1.1E-02 OK|
| W-Mom | 0.88 | 2.3E-05 | 5.7E-03 | 1.2E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 2.08 | 2.6E-07 | 2.7E-05 | 23.9 8.3E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 0.07 | 2.4E-04 | 1.3E-02 | 7.9E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.30 | 2.4E-04 | 4.2E-03 | 16.5 7.9E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 1.46 | 4.4E-05 | 3.6E-03 | 11.4 2.9E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 9.17 | 4.7E-05 | 1.9E-03 | 7.6 5.6E-05 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 3 CPU SECONDS = 5.472E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 1.32 | 1.8E-05 | 4.2E-03 | 1.0E-01 ok|
| V-Mom | 0.69 | 4.9E-05 | 1.1E-02 | 9.4E-02 OK|
| W-Mom | 0.90 | 2.1E-05 | 3.4E-03 | 1.1E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 1.23 | 3.2E-07 | 3.3E-05 | 14.8 6.8E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 0.88 | 2.1E-04 | 1.8E-02 | 9.9E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.63 | 1.5E-04 | 3.3E-03 | 6.2 9.9E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 0.91 | 4.0E-05 | 8.2E-03 | 6.2 9.6E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 1.05 | 5.0E-05 | 3.6E-03 | 7.6 9.1E-05 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 4 CPU SECONDS = 5.510E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 1.03 | 1.8E-05 | 4.3E-03 | 1.0E-01 ok|
| V-Mom | 1.11 | 5.4E-05 | 1.6E-02 | 1.1E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 1.18 | 2.4E-05 | 4.8E-03 | 1.2E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 0.84 | 2.7E-07 | 3.3E-05 | 10.2 6.9E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 0.72 | 1.5E-04 | 2.4E-02 | 8.5E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.23 | 3.5E-05 | 8.9E-04 | 6.2 8.5E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 0.73 | 2.9E-05 | 7.4E-03 | 6.2 8.3E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 0.28 | 1.4E-05 | 1.8E-03 | 7.6 1.1E-04 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 5 CPU SECONDS = 5.548E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 0.78 | 1.4E-05 | 3.0E-03 | 1.0E-01 OK|
| V-Mom | 0.92 | 5.0E-05 | 1.1E-02 | 1.1E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 0.93 | 2.3E-05 | 4.6E-03 | 1.3E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 0.71 | 1.9E-07 | 2.5E-05 | 10.2 4.8E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 0.73 | 1.1E-04 | 1.8E-02 | 7.6E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.57 | 2.0E-05 | 3.1E-04 | 6.2 7.6E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 0.83 | 2.4E-05 | 6.2E-03 | 6.2 7.5E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 0.53 | 7.6E-06 | 1.2E-03 | 7.6 1.6E-04 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 6 CPU SECONDS = 5.585E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 0.91 | 1.3E-05 | 2.5E-03 | 1.1E-01 ok|
| V-Mom | 0.91 | 4.6E-05 | 9.7E-03 | 1.3E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 0.83 | 1.9E-05 | 3.3E-03 | 1.5E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 0.83 | 1.6E-07 | 2.1E-05 | 10.2 5.0E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 0.83 | 9.2E-05 | 1.9E-02 | 7.5E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.45 | 8.8E-06 | 2.1E-04 | 6.2 7.5E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 0.95 | 2.3E-05 | 5.5E-03 | 6.2 7.7E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 0.75 | 5.7E-06 | 1.8E-03 | 7.6 2.3E-04 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 7 CPU SECONDS = 5.623E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 1.15 | 1.5E-05 | 4.7E-03 | 1.1E-01 ok|
| V-Mom | 1.02 | 4.7E-05 | 1.3E-02 | 1.3E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 1.05 | 2.0E-05 | 5.1E-03 | 1.4E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 0.93 | 1.5E-07 | 1.6E-05 | 10.2 5.8E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 1.03 | 9.4E-05 | 2.3E-02 | 7.2E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.68 | 6.0E-06 | 1.7E-04 | 6.2 7.2E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 1.25 | 2.9E-05 | 8.2E-03 | 6.2 7.3E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 0.98 | 5.5E-06 | 2.1E-03 | 7.6 2.7E-04 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 8 CPU SECONDS = 5.660E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 1.15 | 1.7E-05 | 7.5E-03 | 9.9E-02 OK|
| V-Mom | 1.15 | 5.4E-05 | 2.1E-02 | 1.1E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 1.21 | 2.4E-05 | 8.3E-03 | 1.2E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 0.95 | 1.4E-07 | 2.0E-05 | 10.2 5.9E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 1.07 | 1.0E-04 | 2.4E-02 | 6.9E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.86 | 5.1E-06 | 2.6E-04 | 6.2 6.9E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 1.12 | 3.3E-05 | 8.7E-03 | 6.2 6.5E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 0.88 | 4.9E-06 | 1.7E-03 | 7.6 2.5E-04 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 9 CPU SECONDS = 5.698E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 0.95 | 1.6E-05 | 5.5E-03 | 9.5E-02 OK|
| V-Mom | 0.99 | 5.3E-05 | 1.5E-02 | 1.0E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 1.13 | 2.7E-05 | 7.8E-03 | 1.2E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 1.02 | 1.5E-07 | 1.7E-05 | 10.2 4.8E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 0.90 | 9.1E-05 | 1.8E-02 | 7.4E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.95 | 4.9E-06 | 3.5E-04 | 6.2 7.4E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 0.86 | 2.8E-05 | 6.4E-03 | 6.2 6.3E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 0.79 | 3.9E-06 | 1.1E-03 | 7.6 2.4E-04 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 10 CPU SECONDS = 5.735E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 0.85 | 1.4E-05 | 2.9E-03 | 1.0E-01 ok|
| V-Mom | 0.90 | 4.8E-05 | 1.3E-02 | 1.3E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 0.85 | 2.3E-05 | 5.6E-03 | 1.4E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 1.07 | 1.6E-07 | 1.7E-05 | 10.2 4.4E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 0.92 | 8.4E-05 | 1.4E-02 | 9.9E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.97 | 4.7E-06 | 2.5E-04 | 6.2 9.9E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 0.84 | 2.4E-05 | 3.1E-03 | 6.2 6.7E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 1.19 | 4.6E-06 | 1.8E-03 | 7.6 2.4E-04 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 11 CPU SECONDS = 5.773E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 1.10 | 1.5E-05 | 4.1E-03 | 1.0E-01 ok|
| V-Mom | 1.05 | 5.0E-05 | 1.1E-02 | 1.4E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 0.79 | 1.8E-05 | 3.6E-03 | 1.3E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 0.98 | 1.5E-07 | 2.1E-05 | 10.2 5.3E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 1.12 | 9.4E-05 | 1.6E-02 | 2.9E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 0.96 | 4.5E-06 | 2.4E-04 | 11.3 2.9E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE | 1.06 | 2.5E-05 | 5.7E-03 | 6.2 6.8E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq | 1.06 | 4.9E-06 | 2.0E-03 | 7.6 1.8E-04 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 12 CPU SECONDS = 5.810E+04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom | 1.01 | 1.5E-05 | 3.6E-03 | 9.4E-02 OK|
| V-Mom | 1.12 | 5.6E-05 | 1.2E-02 | 1.2E-01 ok|
| W-Mom | 1.18 | 2.1E-05 | 4.5E-03 | 1.2E-01 ok|
| P-Mass | 0.90 | 1.4E-07 | 2.3E-05 | 10.2 5.3E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy | 1.08 | 1.0E-04 | 2.4E-02 | 9.1E-02 OK|
| T-Energy | 1.06 | 4.8E-06 | 2.9E-04 | 6.2 9.1E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. |
| Message: |
| c_fpx_handler: Floating point exception: Invalid Operand |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. |
| Message: |
| Stopped in routine FPX: c_fpx_handler |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| An error has occurred in cfx5solve: |
| |
| The ANSYS CFX solver exited with return code 1. No results file |
| has been created. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

End of solution stage.
Zigainer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2011, 06:13
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5
Keppi is on a distinguished road
Hi Zigainer!

I'm not an expert of transient simulations, not even ANSYS. You should listen to ghorrocks. But I had the same error recently, and there are many good possible solutions on this forum. I advice you to use the search option.
Also, according to your last reply, I would decrease the timestep, instead of increasing the coefficient loops. Double precision may can also help, to avoid rounding errors.
Another possible solution of this problem is to start your transient simulation from a converged steady state solution.
Keppi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2011, 06:37
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
Zigainer is on a distinguished road
Hey,

my calculation starts from a converged stead state calculation with all data from the first timestep.
And again, I had a calculation (same setup) which was running.
The only change was in "solver control" -> Turbulence Numerics -> from First Order to High Resolution.
And I can't believe that this small change destroyed my convergence.
Zigainer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2011, 18:23
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,671
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
And I can't believe
What is this? The X-Files or something? Trust me, and believe. It is diverging. I have seen it a zillion times.

And in this case you seem to be using a massive time step so the first thing I would try is running a time step far smaller than you currently.
Mazze[ITA] likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2011, 18:55
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
Zigainer is on a distinguished road
Hey,

I tried a timestep of 0.01 (one fifth of original one) and it also interrupted.
and again the only change to a running one is turbulence numerics.
And if I watch the residual I can't see a divergence sorry..... residual are getting smaller and smaller and then the error occurce
Zigainer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2011, 21:12
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,671
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
You need a much smaller timestep than that.

Floating point error divergences do not always show up in residuals.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2011, 06:58
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
Zigainer is on a distinguished road
Alright thanks.
I actually do not have enough time for a smaller timestep.
The calculation for the 0.01s timestep would run almost 1 month.
So a smaller timestep is not really possible. I stick to the First Order Turbulence Numerics.
Zigainer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2011, 07:11
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,671
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Do you want it to run or not? Up to you.

You will probably be able to use some small timesteps to start it off and increase them from there. Adaptive time steps (adapting to 3-5 coeff loops per iteration) is very useful here as it does it automatically.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2011, 07:18
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
Zigainer is on a distinguished road
Meanwhile I've got some changes (inlet channel before the ribbed channel) and with these simulation is no problem. Even with the "large" timestep of 0.05s

But thanks for your help!!!
Zigainer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2011, 07:31
Default
  #12
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,671
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Why didn't you say that before? So it is more likely then you have a setup problem with this simulation but not the other.

Can you post an image of both geometries?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2011, 08:38
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
Zigainer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Can you post an image of both geometries?
The ribbed channel part is the same for both. The new calculation just got an extra un-ribbed-inlet-channel.
The calculation which is not running doesn't use a velocity- and temperature-profile at the inlet.

---edit:
btw its a conjugated calculation
Attached Images
File Type: jpg channel_1.jpg (24.8 KB, 84 views)
File Type: jpg channel_2.jpg (33.3 KB, 72 views)
Zigainer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2011, 17:21
Default
  #14
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,671
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
If the longer simulation runs OK then it is likely to be something wrong with your setup of the shorter one. If you also changed the inlet BC type between runs then that is likely to be the problem.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2011, 14:22
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
Zigainer is on a distinguished road
The INLET condition is the same for both simualtions.
The new longer calcualtion is running, so tahts fine for me. I don't need the shorter one, anyway. There've been an other problem with velocity-profil anyway.
Thanks for your help.
Zigainer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time average results in Transient CFX Simulation BalanceChen CFX 20 June 1, 2015 12:50
courant number for transient flow on CFX ? amine CFX 13 August 20, 2013 19:02
Can workbench and cfx run correctly on vista? Sandam CFX 1 December 2, 2007 17:32
mesh deformation in transient run Ichi CFX 1 July 27, 2005 18:26
run Build Topology in IcemCFD 4 CFX Ahmed CFX 3 March 19, 2004 17:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:53.