CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Definition of fluid-solid interaction

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 21, 2011, 11:13
Default Definition of fluid-solid interaction
  #1
New Member
 
jean-françois jerier
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 6
syens is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I want to model the interaction between a fixed rigid body (e.g., a sphere) and a fluid.
From my weak experience, I identified two methods:

Englobing domain: you define in DesignModeler an englobing geometry around your sphere. (Ref:http://www.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3...8LI1InUA6sIhBQ)

Cutted domain: you define in DesignModeler, two superposed solids (sphere+box) and after you remove (or substract) the sphere from the box.
(Ref: http://people.civil.aau.dk/~i5mr/vm2..._tutorials.pdf see: Blunt Body)

What is the best way to model this kind of interaction for you ?
Have you some exemples or references to give me ?

Thank you
Regards
JF
syens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2011, 18:03
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,397
Rep Power: 96
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
The answer to this question depends on what you are modelling.

How big is the sphere? How strong is the flow? What physics are you modelling - just the motion of the sphere or other stuff as well? Does the sphere have mass? Transient or steady state? If transient, then on what time scale?

As you can see there is lots we need to know before we can answer your question.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2011, 03:55
Default
  #3
New Member
 
jean-françois jerier
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 6
syens is on a distinguished road
Hi Ghorrocks,

Thank you for your reply, I agree with your comments. I would have had to give more information about my simulation, I thought there was a general way to model the fluid-rigid body interaction.

Concerning my transient simulation (duration 40s), I would like to visualize the gas flux passing through a structure having holes with complex geometric shapes (rigid body).

Best regards
JF
syens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2011, 05:43
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,397
Rep Power: 96
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
There are several methods of modelling this and which one is best depends on all the questions I asked.

If the flow is through some sort of structure then you have better show an image of the structure and an idea of what the gas velocities are.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2011, 06:11
Default
  #5
New Member
 
jean-françois jerier
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 6
syens is on a distinguished road
I understand what you mean, but I cannot post this geometry on the web (sorry !!!). Otherwise I loose my job.

However, I am testing the method with the englobing domain. When I try to apply the boundary conditions, I see that the fixed rigid sphere has two layers as you can see on the 2 attached files.

Please, anyone can explain me why I have these two surfaces to define the sphere.

Thanks in advance
JF
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Image_1.jpg (86.9 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg Image_2.jpg (84.4 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg Image_3.jpg (99.3 KB, 18 views)
syens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2011, 07:36
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,397
Rep Power: 96
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
If the exact geometry is confidential then post something like it. Without context this conversation is pretty meaningless.

You have two surfaces because you meshed the sphere as well, so one mesh on the spherical face in the outer block and one mesh on the spheres outer face.

There are three main ways this can be modelled - rigid body solver with moving mesh, rigid body solver with immersed solid or with particle tracking. You still have not given me any information to put this in context so I cannot comment on which is most appropriate.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2011, 08:42
Default
  #7
New Member
 
jean-françois jerier
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 6
syens is on a distinguished road
You can see the design of the holes and the thickness of the part in the attached files. I try to visualize the gas flowing through this part.

Concerning the rigid sphere simulation, in fact when you have a rigid body (i.e., a solid) and an englobing box, you have 2 solids in geometry section.
Therefore, you are obliged to mesh these 2 solids.

If you want to represent the rigid body geometry in the CFD simulation, do you always have to do a mark (i.e, a footmark by a boolean operation) in your domain ?

Best regards
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image_1.JPG (33.7 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg image_2.JPG (39.2 KB, 8 views)

Last edited by syens; December 22, 2011 at 09:21.
syens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2011, 17:01
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,397
Rep Power: 96
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
The different rigid body approaches require different meshes.

Deforming mesh rigid body does not require the body to be meshed, it needs to be a cut-out in the fluid domain.

Immersed solid rigid body requires the fluid mesh to cover the entire domain (ie including the volume originally occupied by the body) and the body to be a surface mesh.

Particle tracking requires the fluid mesh to cover the entire domain and does not need a mesh for the body.

So there is different mesh requirements for each approach, and what you have done matches none of them.

Quote:
If you want to represent the rigid body geometry in the CFD simulation, do you always have to do a mark (i.e, a footmark by a boolean operation) in your domain ?
I do not know what you are talking about.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re-meshing a deformable solid body in a fluid brashear CFX 6 December 12, 2011 12:13
Problem Interface Solid Fluid with wall velocity Solver v12 hills1 CFX 2 October 12, 2009 05:36
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07
No results for solid domain Gary Holland CFX 10 March 13, 2009 04:30
Fluid Structure Interaction with FreeFem ++ Pierre Main CFD Forum 1 November 21, 2008 00:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:11.