|
[Sponsors] |
July 27, 2012, 11:19 |
upwind-high res. blending
|
#1 |
New Member
|
Hello, is there any difference if someone run a upwind advection scheme, and then:
__________________
-- Kyriakos Vafiadis Mechanical Engineer, PhD candidate |
|
July 27, 2012, 13:34 |
|
#2 |
Member
Felipe Gobbi
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Brazil
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 14 |
I believe you can find something about it in the section Wiki CFD here at this website.
Have you read the Ansys Help Documentation? |
|
July 27, 2012, 13:56 |
|
#3 |
New Member
|
I already read the documentation but I can't find something.
I would like any suggestions from the cfdonline community experience I already run a simulation about this and I will post my conclusions!
__________________
-- Kyriakos Vafiadis Mechanical Engineer, PhD candidate |
|
July 28, 2012, 08:07 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
The documentation describes all this. But for a fully converged steady state solution, in general it does not matter what the initial condition was. A good initial condition will converge faster, but the end result is the same. A small number of flows are bimodal (or multi-modal) and the intiial condition determines which final state they end up in.
But the final converged solution will be different if you use different advection schemes. Note high res is not an available option for continuity. Continuity does not advection so has no need for an advection scheme. The high res option only applies to momentum and scalar equations. The important option for continuity is what P-V coupling is applied. |
|
July 29, 2012, 09:23 |
|
#5 |
New Member
|
I agree about the continuity equation. And thank you for your considerations! But what made me have this confusion was that:
solver control>equation class settings?equation class: continuity has the option for an advection scheme and moreover it has the three choices used for advection in CFX, upwind, high resolution and specified blend factor. My testing with this gives that the advection scheme for continuity does nothing...
__________________
-- Kyriakos Vafiadis Mechanical Engineer, PhD candidate Last edited by k.vafiadis; July 29, 2012 at 09:28. Reason: addes a picture |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 12:29 |
pressure eq. "converges" after few time steps | maddalena | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 69 | July 21, 2011 07:42 |
about upwind and high resolution | Eric | CFX | 1 | December 30, 2006 06:56 |
upwind vs high resolution | Richard | CFX | 3 | February 20, 2006 06:35 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 05:12 |