CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Polyhedral Mesh and CFX!!!

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 24, 2012, 06:27
Default Polyhedral Mesh and CFX!!!
  #1
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,905
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Dear All

It has been discussed on CFX forum already that the CFX is vertex centred solver and constructs the cell around the vertex. Thereby making the control volumes of different shapes (not similar to original mesh as Fluent Does) and rougly can classified as polyhedrals. My question is that if CFX can handle or by dafult creates the polyhedral control volume, then why CFX cannot read the polyhedral mesh?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 24, 2012, 07:10
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Because the only element topologies which it can construct the polygons from are tet, pyramid, wedge and hexes. For elements more complex than this it is not easy to contruct the control volumes around the nodes.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 24, 2012, 07:50
Default
  #3
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,905
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
same goes for hanging nodes?

(Following are some observations I have made over the years for both solvers not directly related this post)

CFX users shall not be benefited from the new meshing technology developed (still developing) in ANSYS meshing such as cut cell and cut tet methods in version 13 and 14. On the other hand Fluent can handle them easily.

This is the clear reason why ANSYS kept both solvers in CFD suit and investing time and money in developing them further. And they have also improved the Fluent convergence speed considerably and it is now similar to CFX.

Both are best in their respective areas.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2012, 06:47
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Yes, same goes for hanging nodes. CFX's normal control volume needs to be modified to handle it and that has not been done yet.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] CGNS mesh failing in CFX siw ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 March 14, 2011 14:53
simulating 2D airfoil mesh in CFX iffy ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 March 9, 2011 04:53
CFX mesh & ICEM mike CFX 3 April 27, 2006 15:27
hex mesh using cfx mesh. mehul CFX 3 December 12, 2005 23:06
hex mesh using cfx mesh. mehul CFX 0 October 31, 2005 08:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31.