CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

convergence problem

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 28, 2012, 10:00
Default convergence problem
  #1
Member
 
albert
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 14
pato is on a distinguished road
hi, i am trying to modelate a difusser with porous media instead of perforated plate, with an steady state model. My problem is that i donīt get any convergence. I know i have to look at the residuals since a read cfx-documentation. Here is the location of max residualas:

--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Locations of Maximum Residuals |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Equation | Node # | X | Y | Z |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| U-Mom-fluid media | 1481 | 1.926E-02 | 1.780E-01 | 0.000E+00 |
| V-Mom-fluid media | 35131 | 4.058E-03 | 1.780E-01 |-8.202E-03 |
| W-Mom-fluid media | 654443 | 4.795E-02 | 1.880E-01 |-2.501E-03 |
| P-Mass-fluid media | 33090 | 7.858E-03 | 1.780E-01 |-4.402E-03 |
| U-Mom-porous media | 70 | 0.000E+00 | 1.880E-01 |-8.202E-03 |
| V-Mom-porous media | 9790 | 4.058E-03 | 1.780E-01 |-8.202E-03 |
| W-Mom-porous media | 1033 | 1.926E-02 | 1.780E-01 | 0.000E+00 |
| P-Mass-porous media | 1039 | 0.000E+00 | 1.780E-01 |-3.740E-03 |
| K-TurbKE-fluid media | 654443 | 4.795E-02 | 1.880E-01 |-2.501E-03 |
| E-Diss.K-fluid media | 1481 | 1.926E-02 | 1.780E-01 | 0.000E+00 |
| K-TurbKE-porous medi | 12455 | 4.031E-01 | 1.780E-01 |-8.202E-03 |
| E-Diss.K-porous medi | 2253 | 4.012E-01 | 1.780E-01 |-1.005E-02 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+



I always get the max residuals in those surfaces which are perpendicular to the given moment type (X;Y,Z) i.e, for max U-Mom, i have max residuals in surfacers perpendicular to x direction. I donīt know whether that is very important or not. I already tried changing timescale factor and others, but my model does not reach convergence. COULD YOU PLEASE HELP ME TO REACH CONVERGENCE????


thank you
pato is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 28, 2012, 12:36
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Zurich
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 15
Chander is on a distinguished road
You should explain your problem in more detail. Location of the residuals does not say much unless you also show the domain.
Try the following quick checks..
check mesh quality in the .out...make sure everything is fine
what is the Reynolds number of your flow...are you using the correct fluid model (laminar/ turbulent)?
also look at the following link for guidance..
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria
Chander is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 28, 2012, 14:27
Default
  #3
Member
 
albert
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 14
pato is on a distinguished road
actually i had good convergence when i had a normal fluid media for a perforated diffuser, but when i tried to change this perforated plate into a porous media, is when i cannot get convergence. Is it more difficult to reach convergence in porous models?
my model is quite simple and with the perforated plate worked well with steady state simulations. Should it also work with steady state simulations when changing it into a porous media??
pato is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 28, 2012, 17:23
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
There has been some modifications in V14 to make porous regions converge better. What version of CFX are you running?
ghorrocks is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   February 28, 2012, 18:20
Default
  #5
Member
 
albert
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 14
pato is on a distinguished road
ansys 12.1 cfx-5
pato is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 29, 2012, 05:51
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
I think you will find the convergence behaviour has improved significantly with the latest release. Time to upgrade to V14.
ghorrocks is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2012, 04:52
Default
  #7
Member
 
albert
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 14
pato is on a distinguished road
But is it normal that exactly with same geom and boundary conditions as in a normal fluid media, i don`t reach convergenece?? could the problem have changed to transient???
I am quite stucked and can not go any further. My monitor points indicating velocity(the ones at the beginning and at the end of the diffuser) begin by 20 it to oscilate and reach high velocities.

Could anyone help meŋ
pato is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2012, 04:59
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Zurich
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 15
Chander is on a distinguished road
Yes, it is possible. Flow impingement on porous medium can cause problems in convergence. You asked wether your problem is transient. You can check this by following a simple check given in CFX manual under tips for convergence.
Also, try increasing the timestep and grid size..that may smear out the transients.
Just go through once the CFX manual part on convergence problems..that should give you some clue.
Also, as I asked you earlier, did you check if you are using the correct fluid model as per the flow reynolds number?
Chander is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2012, 05:01
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Zurich
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 15
Chander is on a distinguished road
And do try with V14 as per Glen's suggestion. I had similar problems but unfortunately no access to CFX 14.
Chander is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2012, 05:54
Default
  #10
Member
 
albert
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 14
pato is on a distinguished road
Unfortunately i also do not have acces to v14.
quick summary,

with 0Pa static pressure as opening boundary condition i got floating point problem, overflow. After seaching on the forum, i changed this pressure for a small one, 8Pa, and also changed to SST turbulence model, and timestep 0.1, beeing those boundaries maybe the cause of the floating point.

Well, my mass and momentum plots do not oscilate anymore, but residuals do have oscilatory behaviour. Velocities in monitor points oscilate a lot(think of function sin(x), my velocities oscilates similar to this function, up and down).
i checked and tried things in the manual like:

decreasing timestep size,
using physical timescale

but nothing seems to work

should i try transient?
pato is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
convergence problem when use pisoFoam, LES for wind tunnel case Forrest_Lei OpenFOAM 3 July 19, 2011 06:00
convergence problem commonyue Main CFD Forum 1 December 1, 2009 03:54
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis nasdak CFX 2 June 29, 2009 01:17
3D Fluid Flow Convergence problem Emily FLUENT 2 March 21, 2007 22:18
Non Convergence of 3D Heat transfer cfd problem Balraj Main CFD Forum 3 December 9, 2004 00:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37.