CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

boundaries problem?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 1, 2012, 04:36
Default boundaries problem?
  #1
Member
 
albert
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 4
pato is on a distinguished road
Hi, iīm sorry to post a thread again but i donīt manage to solve the problem.
Iīm modelating a flow in porous media. The flow enters in horizontal direction, and as it goes through the channel, exits in vertical direction. In my first model the flow exit vertically trogh little holes in a perforated plate(air diffuser, and everything went allright. Now my task is to change this perforated plate for porous media. I Use exactly the same model, with same boundary conditions, but with porous media, i don get convergence, having floating point problem, overflow. Is it normal that with the same geom(ecept the porous layer instead of perforated layer), i have problems to achieve results??

Here my boundary conditions:

Steady state simulation
inlet: mass flow
opening: static pressure (with 0 Pa overflow problem)
Advection scheme : high resolution
Auto timescale
turbulence model:k-epsilon, (trying now with SST)
porous media: no permeability, no reisistance loss coefficient

In perforated plate i had no outlet, using the opening as an outlet. That should also work now, shouldnīt it?

How could i achieve a good convergence, or at least reliable results?
pato is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2012, 17:10
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,205
Rep Power: 74
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
This is discussed in your other thread. Porous regions are handled totally differently to interface conditions and has its own issues with numerical stability. The numerical stability of porous regions has been improved in V14 so it sounds like a good time to upgrade.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2012, 17:41
Default
  #3
Member
 
albert
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 4
pato is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your answer. Nevertheless i have no acces to v14. Could anybody help me to treat this problem with v12??
any tips??should i use same boundary conditions as in normal fluid media??
pato is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2012, 06:52
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,205
Rep Power: 74
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
If you do not need to use the porous approach then don't use it if it causes problems. Other than that, I can only recommend the normal things for when you have numerical instability - smaller time steps, better mesh quality, better initial guess, double precision etc etc.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2012, 21:46
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 430
Rep Power: 8
evcelica is on a distinguished road
I think setting the permeability to ZERO could be a problem!!!

You are trying to flow through an IMPERMEABLE membrane, that could probably give you some problems.
If you look at the momentum equation for a porous media, you are dividing by zero, which is usually a bad thing.....
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2012, 05:14
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,205
Rep Power: 74
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Did he say zero permeability? I did not see that. Yes, that would definitely be a problem.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2012, 12:02
Default
  #7
Member
 
albert
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 4
pato is on a distinguished road
actually i didnīt set any value for permeability.
Is it the same as permeability 0?
Is it normal to have floating point problem then for very small permeabilities, like 1e-7mm2 or smaller?
pato is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2012, 17:07
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 430
Rep Power: 8
evcelica is on a distinguished road
My mistake,
I just saw no permeability and assumed you input a value of zero. If you did not insert a permeability then no, that is not the same as setting it to zero, that part of the equation is just omitted from the equations then.

I have noticed is very hard / impossible to converge when you have very small values of permeability since you start approaching the divide by zero problem.

The "CFX-Solver Theory Guide" will tell you how this is all calculated mathematically, and could perhaps shine some light onto what is causing the problem.
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Handling cyclic BC from gambit to openfoam for a cascade airfoil problem - OF 1.6 maverick OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 June 18, 2011 04:36
Velocity profiles problem behind the elbow (3D problem) kabat73 FLUENT 8 May 9, 2010 04:26
periodic boundaries - flow through a net PK FLUENT 0 July 12, 2007 11:58
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) ParodDav CFX 5 April 29, 2007 19:13
Is this problem well posed? Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 5 September 8, 1999 14:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25.