|
[Sponsors] |
March 15, 2012, 04:33 |
Boundary conditions, helpppppp
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Safia
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 161
Rep Power: 15 |
could any one tell me how I can create Neumann conditions for the velocity , zeta, k & T? i mean make the deravative of them with respect to distance equal to 0? please do not tell me use symmetry condition because it is different.
Regards |
|
March 15, 2012, 04:47 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
Have a look in the documentation for symmetry planes and outlets/openings. They all use different combinations of dV/dN=0.
|
|
March 15, 2012, 19:34 |
My Q. with other words
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Safia
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 161
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Regards |
||
March 15, 2012, 19:51 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
At an inlet or outlet?
|
|
March 15, 2012, 21:36 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Safia
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 161
Rep Power: 15 |
||
March 15, 2012, 21:47 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
I see. For CFX the values used are convected from the internal nodes. Why isn't that good enough? I would have thought that would be more accurate than imposing dV/dN=0.
Before you spend weeks developing your own boundary condition (which is probably less accurate than the one already in CFX, so I do not see how it will help you), the normal response when BCs are causing errors in the simulation is to move the BCs further away from the region of interest so the error from the BC causes less error in the region of interest. Why not simply move the boundaries further out? |
|
March 15, 2012, 22:34 |
my replay
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
Safia
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 161
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
thanks for your input. Regards |
||
March 16, 2012, 03:03 |
question, reply ASAP, please
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Safia
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 161
Rep Power: 15 |
[QUOTE=happy;349755]yep,,, that is what I'm working with now;however, I read and attempt to find more realistic B.Cs.
By the way, the top of my domain is also my interst place to see the effect of many parameters on the velocity at the top. So glenn, what you think the solution for my case. as I read the this website I thing I need to creare routine with fortran compiler. I searched into ansys.com, but the threads overthere is for create expression to calculate the drevative w.r.t. time only into post stage. i have already three references use the same B.C at the domain top. Any input can help My best regards |
|
March 16, 2012, 04:26 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
Yes, if you really want to use Neumann BCs then you better code it in fortran.
I still have no idea what you are modelling and why you need this BC, so my general advice remains that moving the BCs further back from the region of interest and using the existing BCs is far easier and more accurate. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions | Anindya | Main CFD Forum | 25 | February 27, 2016 12:58 |
symmetry boundary conditions in cfx | lost.identity | CFX | 41 | May 22, 2013 07:21 |
OpenFOAM Variable Velocity Boundary Conditions | NickolasPl | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | May 19, 2011 05:37 |
[Netgen] boundary conditions and mesh exporting | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | May 27, 2010 09:38 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |