CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > enGrid

Initial prism layer height

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By ogloth
  • 1 Post By ogloth

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 26, 2014, 15:54
Post Initial prism layer height
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 6
taxalian is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have been using engrid now for quite a while and i always used default prism generation settings to obtain the viscous mesh. But at the moment i would like to control the initial prism layer height manually i.e user defined. I tried to modify the boundary layer parameters but to no success at all.

I am using Engrid V1.4 and the parameters related to prismatic boundary layer generation are seems to be default fixed values because if you try to tweak them engrid complains about that and mostly it gives some internal error and then you have to restart engrid:

relative height of first cell = 0.001 (default)
absolute height of first cell = 1.0 (default)
ratio last layer/farfield = 0.8 (default)

So now here the question is engrid uses kind of top - down prism generation approach. First of all the single prismatic layer is generated around the viscous wall. Then later on this single layer is divided into further prismatic layers. What if i want to have a specific boundary layer thickness say at trailing edge of the wing or at certain distance downstream over the flat plate or cylinder etc. How can i achieve this i tried to tweak these parameters and also some additional parameters but no improvement.

Thanks and regards.
taxalian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2014, 04:32
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Oliver Gloth
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Todtnau, Germany
Posts: 114
Rep Power: 8
ogloth is on a distinguished road
Hello,

you cannot specify the total height of the boundary layer mesh. This used to be possible, but proved to nit be required. The farfield ratio leads to a decent transition to the far field mesh. Once you have an isotropic mesh (appr. ratio of 0.3-0.8) you don't need to use prisms.

An important parameter, however, is the weighting between relative and absolute height of the first cell. Relative size means the height is a fraction of the edge length on the surface and absolute is absolute. So, you can set this parameter to 0 or 1 -- anything in between didn't prove to be particularly useful ...

The next release will possibly have the option to prescribe the initial height in the same manner that the surface resolution is prescribed at the moment.

'hope this helps!

Regards,
Oliver
taxalian likes this.
ogloth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2014, 12:33
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 6
taxalian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogloth View Post
Hello,

you cannot specify the total height of the boundary layer mesh. This used to be possible, but proved to nit be required. The farfield ratio leads to a decent transition to the far field mesh. Once you have an isotropic mesh (appr. ratio of 0.3-0.8) you don't need to use prisms.

An important parameter, however, is the weighting between relative and absolute height of the first cell. Relative size means the height is a fraction of the edge length on the surface and absolute is absolute. So, you can set this parameter to 0 or 1 -- anything in between didn't prove to be particularly useful ...

The next release will possibly have the option to prescribe the initial height in the same manner that the surface resolution is prescribed at the moment.

'hope this helps!

Regards,
Oliver
Hi,
Thanks for your reply, when is the next engrid release coming.
Regards.
taxalian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2014, 09:48
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Oliver Gloth
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Todtnau, Germany
Posts: 114
Rep Power: 8
ogloth is on a distinguished road
Hi -- sorry, but it took a bit longish to reply...

The next release will possibly be ready at some point in the summer.

We are currently trying to use TetGen as an alternative to Netgen which would enable a more "1-click" approach to the meshing process. I'd expect that to start being usable in the next week or two. So, if you are happy to play with an unstable version, you might have some of the features a lot sooner. I'll announce it on our homepage (via Twitter), as soon as it can be tested.

Regards,
Oliver
taxalian likes this.

Last edited by ogloth; April 4, 2014 at 09:48. Reason: typo
ogloth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2014, 12:33
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 6
taxalian is on a distinguished road
Hi Oliver,
That sounds great, just let me know about the release of unstable version so that i can test that one.
Regards,
Taxalian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogloth View Post
Hi -- sorry, but it took a bit longish to reply...

The next release will possibly be ready at some point in the summer.

We are currently trying to use TetGen as an alternative to Netgen which would enable a more "1-click" approach to the meshing process. I'd expect that to start being usable in the next week or two. So, if you are happy to play with an unstable version, you might have some of the features a lot sooner. I'll announce it on our homepage (via Twitter), as soon as it can be tested.

Regards,
Oliver
taxalian is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cannot run the code properly: very large time step continuity error crst15 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 December 14, 2014 19:17
Simulation seems to converge but crashes suddenly xxxx OpenFOAM 16 September 12, 2014 08:07
a problem with convergence in buoyantSimpleFoam skuznet OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 February 19, 2014 05:30
Courant-number explodes after a lon while (icoFoam) Rody- OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 January 29, 2014 05:27
calculation stops after few time steps sivakumar OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 March 17, 2013 07:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:15.