CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM

FloEFD.V5 - Problems with Heat Source

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 20, 2009, 09:13
Default FloEFD.V5 - Problems with Heat Source
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
CP85 is on a distinguished road
Hello!

I am trying to simulate a simplified cylinder of a small engine with FloEFD.V5.

Therefore I set up an internal analysis. The cylinder ist put in a rectangular room with a constant volume flow of air (for cooling). Exclude cavities without flow conditions is activatet. (so the inner air-volume of the cylinder is not modelled).
Heat conduction in Solids is activatet and I am running a stationary analysis.
The default material is aluminium, the rectangular box is an insulator.

Some facts I know from reality:
The volume flow arround the cylinder (~218 m³/h)
The material of the cylinder (aluminium)
The heat generation of the engine (~7kW)
In reality this leads to surfacetemperatures of max 250°C

Now I tried to simulate this but I got much larger temperatures (above the melting point).

So has anyone an idea how I can set up the simulation so that it fits the real measured data?

I tried the following heat sources without luck:
Volumesource at the complete cylinder
Surfacesource on the complete inner cylinderwall
Surfacesource on the upper inner cylinderwall (were the combustion takes place)
I treid: 7kW (leads to temp. ~1000°C); 5kW (leads to temp. ~800°C)


So any ideas or hints for me?

kind regards
CP
CP85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2009, 08:22
Default
  #2
YYY
New Member
 
YY
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
YYY is on a distinguished road
How did you apply the air volume flow for it in the box? by the surface? and the temperature of air?

why do not you use the external analysis?
YYY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2009, 08:57
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
CP85 is on a distinguished road
I'll make a Screenshot of how I applied the boundary conditions and how the modell looks like.
Otherwise it will be hard to describe.
I'll post it within the next 24h.

I did not set up an external analysis, because it would not fit to reality.
CP85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2009, 09:56
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
CP85 is on a distinguished road
Here the picture:

Red Arrows: Volume Flow: 218 m³/h
Blue Arrows: Enviromental pressure
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Wärmetest (2).jpg (64.1 KB, 24 views)
CP85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2009, 14:32
Default It seems OK
  #5
YYY
New Member
 
YY
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
YYY is on a distinguished road
1) if you define the heat source for surface,you can have W/m^2 or W. You should check it is W or W/m^2.
2) The material is Aluminum, could you check the thermal conductivity of it in the default material setting? I always input the material by myself.
3) refining mesh
4) I believe the results could be a little higher than the experiment results since you have defined the box as the insulator. but 1000C vs. 250C is too much difference.

Your case is not complicated actually. The air flow cool the 7KW heat source with Al material.
YYY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2009, 14:34
Default By the way
  #6
YYY
New Member
 
YY
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
YYY is on a distinguished road
what is gerneral setting you defined over the wall condition?
YYY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2009, 04:30
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
CP85 is on a distinguished road
1) it is W
2) seems to be ok:
150K = 248 W/(m*K)
200K = 237 W/(m*K)
300K = 237 W/(m*K)
400K = 240 W/(m*K)
600K = 230 W/(m*K)
3) I tried this a few days ago. Indeed the temperatur drecreesed a bit, but not enough to reach the 250°C. Seems that a fine wall boundary resolution is needed.
4) I think I will give it up to use the same heat source as in reality.
I will try modify and decreese the Heat Source as long as I reach the measured temperatures.
5) general settings:
Default outer wall thermal condition: adiabatic
Roughness: 0 mircometer


Thank you for your thoughts and informations!

Last edited by CP85; October 30, 2009 at 08:56.
CP85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2009, 07:11
Default do you try to calculate heat transfer by emperical way
  #8
YYY
New Member
 
YY
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
YYY is on a distinguished road
I think you will have the insights about it.
I suggest you contact your F LOEFD supplier and post your problem to them. they may give your some hints.
success!
YYY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2009, 17:41
Default
  #9
New Member
 
murat
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
murat is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by CP85 View Post
1) it is W
2) seems to be ok:
150K = 248 W/(m*K)
200K = 237 W/(m*K)
300K = 237 W/(m*K)
400K = 240 W/(m*K)
600K = 230 W/(m*K)
3) I tried this a few days ago. Indeed the temperatur drecreesed a bit, but not enough to reach the 250°C. Seems that a fine wall boundary resolution is needed.
4) I think I will give it up to use the same heat source as in reality.
I will try modify and decreese the Heat Source as long as I reach the measured temperatures.
5) general settings:
Default outer wall thermal condition: adiabatic
Roughness: 0 mircometer


Thank you for your thoughts and informations!
My suggestions

1- You use only volume heat source
2- You use refinement mesh which is in Calculation Control Options if the model need more mesh FloEFD add automatically while solving according to velocity gradient vector
3- You set up converge criteria again and decrase it
4- I do not know but fluid intial temperature is different from solid may be you should create intial conditions for heater solid
murat is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
conduction, cylinder, engine, floefd.v5, heat

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Version 15 on Mac OS X gschaider OpenFOAM Installation 120 December 2, 2009 10:23
How to model a moving heat source? James FLOW-3D 10 March 17, 2009 12:49
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI jens_klostermann OpenFOAM Bugs 11 June 28, 2007 17:51
how to define volme heat source in udf ? wanghong FLUENT 0 February 24, 2006 03:53
heat source in a domain aydin FLUENT 0 January 3, 2003 07:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:04.