FloEFD.V5 - Problems with Heat Source

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 20, 2009, 09:13 FloEFD.V5 - Problems with Heat Source #1 New Member   Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 9 Hello! I am trying to simulate a simplified cylinder of a small engine with FloEFD.V5. Therefore I set up an internal analysis. The cylinder ist put in a rectangular room with a constant volume flow of air (for cooling). Exclude cavities without flow conditions is activatet. (so the inner air-volume of the cylinder is not modelled). Heat conduction in Solids is activatet and I am running a stationary analysis. The default material is aluminium, the rectangular box is an insulator. Some facts I know from reality: The volume flow arround the cylinder (~218 m³/h) The material of the cylinder (aluminium) The heat generation of the engine (~7kW) In reality this leads to surfacetemperatures of max 250°C Now I tried to simulate this but I got much larger temperatures (above the melting point). So has anyone an idea how I can set up the simulation so that it fits the real measured data? I tried the following heat sources without luck: Volumesource at the complete cylinder Surfacesource on the complete inner cylinderwall Surfacesource on the upper inner cylinderwall (were the combustion takes place) I treid: 7kW (leads to temp. ~1000°C); 5kW (leads to temp. ~800°C) So any ideas or hints for me? kind regards CP

 October 28, 2009, 08:22 #2 New Member   YY Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 9 How did you apply the air volume flow for it in the box? by the surface? and the temperature of air? why do not you use the external analysis?

 October 28, 2009, 08:57 #3 New Member   Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 9 I'll make a Screenshot of how I applied the boundary conditions and how the modell looks like. Otherwise it will be hard to describe. I'll post it within the next 24h. I did not set up an external analysis, because it would not fit to reality.

October 29, 2009, 09:56
#4
New Member

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9
Here the picture:

Red Arrows: Volume Flow: 218 m³/h
Blue Arrows: Enviromental pressure
Attached Images
 Wärmetest (2).jpg (64.1 KB, 25 views)

 October 29, 2009, 14:32 It seems OK #5 New Member   YY Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 9 1) if you define the heat source for surface,you can have W/m^2 or W. You should check it is W or W/m^2. 2) The material is Aluminum, could you check the thermal conductivity of it in the default material setting? I always input the material by myself. 3) refining mesh 4) I believe the results could be a little higher than the experiment results since you have defined the box as the insulator. but 1000C vs. 250C is too much difference. Your case is not complicated actually. The air flow cool the 7KW heat source with Al material.

 October 29, 2009, 14:34 By the way #6 New Member   YY Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 9 what is gerneral setting you defined over the wall condition?

 October 30, 2009, 04:30 #7 New Member   Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 9 1) it is W 2) seems to be ok: 150K = 248 W/(m*K) 200K = 237 W/(m*K) 300K = 237 W/(m*K) 400K = 240 W/(m*K) 600K = 230 W/(m*K) 3) I tried this a few days ago. Indeed the temperatur drecreesed a bit, but not enough to reach the 250°C. Seems that a fine wall boundary resolution is needed. 4) I think I will give it up to use the same heat source as in reality. I will try modify and decreese the Heat Source as long as I reach the measured temperatures. 5) general settings: Default outer wall thermal condition: adiabatic Roughness: 0 mircometer Thank you for your thoughts and informations! Last edited by CP85; October 30, 2009 at 08:56.

 October 30, 2009, 07:11 do you try to calculate heat transfer by emperical way #8 New Member   YY Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 9 I think you will have the insights about it. I suggest you contact your F LOEFD supplier and post your problem to them. they may give your some hints. success!

November 2, 2009, 18:41
#9
New Member

murat
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 9
Quote:
 Originally Posted by CP85 1) it is W 2) seems to be ok: 150K = 248 W/(m*K) 200K = 237 W/(m*K) 300K = 237 W/(m*K) 400K = 240 W/(m*K) 600K = 230 W/(m*K) 3) I tried this a few days ago. Indeed the temperatur drecreesed a bit, but not enough to reach the 250°C. Seems that a fine wall boundary resolution is needed. 4) I think I will give it up to use the same heat source as in reality. I will try modify and decreese the Heat Source as long as I reach the measured temperatures. 5) general settings: Default outer wall thermal condition: adiabatic Roughness: 0 mircometer Thank you for your thoughts and informations!
My suggestions

1- You use only volume heat source
2- You use refinement mesh which is in Calculation Control Options if the model need more mesh FloEFD add automatically while solving according to velocity gradient vector
3- You set up converge criteria again and decrase it
4- I do not know but fluid intial temperature is different from solid may be you should create intial conditions for heater solid

 Tags conduction, cylinder, engine, floefd.v5, heat

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post James FLOW-3D 11 January 7, 2015 22:59 gschaider OpenFOAM Installation 120 December 2, 2009 11:23 jens_klostermann OpenFOAM Bugs 11 June 28, 2007 17:51 wanghong FLUENT 0 February 24, 2006 04:53 aydin FLUENT 0 January 3, 2003 08:01

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:38.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top