CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM

ship propeller thrust performance analysis

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 3, 2010, 10:02
Default ship propeller thrust performance analysis
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
burak samsul is on a distinguished road
Hi,

First of all, I have recently started to work on floworks. I have designed lots of propeller models by using different engineering programs. Finally i need to see the thrust differences between some types propellers. In my calculations; i have a constant flow, a rotating region and static pressure. I have defined some global and surface goals. Unexpectedly i got different results when i make a calculation completely the same. Because some of the goals are unable to be converged in some calculations. And i am curious about; why i am getting different very different result when i add a goal or remove one of them. I have to get some more informations about selection of the goals according to the type of analysis...

Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 01.jpg (92.2 KB, 114 views)
burak samsul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2010, 05:13
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Boris Marovic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11
Boris_M is on a distinguished road
Hi burak,
In your case I wouldn't use an internal analysis and pressure boundary conditions. Use an external simulation and the stability problems should most likely vanish. I thinkg this is probably because you forced him to have the same pressure on both sides and with external this is just an initial condition and would change as its getting calculated. You can also define a velocity as the initial conditions as if the ship is moving already, which would influence the flow and reactions on the propeller.

In general it can take longer to converge for rotating calculations so it is best to switch off the maximum travels in the calculation control options.
It can even have values in the beginning that don't make sense such as inflow on all sides but this will then change over time as the calculation proceeds.

Regards,
Boris
Boris_M is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2010, 09:13
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
burak samsul is on a distinguished road
Thanks a lot Boris,

I am preparing a model according to your advices. It seems very sensible. Thanks for your help again.

Best Regards.
burak samsul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2011, 04:53
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
burak samsul is on a distinguished road
Hi Boris,

First of all external analysis' are very stabile and sensible. I have one more question ; what will be the best comparing value or plot for two propellers working on same boat with same engine. I have to decide this for lots of propellers and i have to be sure. Force values are showing differences according to the constant flow values so i need a clue for comparing the performances.

Regards.
burak samsul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2011, 18:38
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Boris Marovic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11
Boris_M is on a distinguished road
Hi burak,
Good to hear that you make progress. Unfortunately it's some time ago that I worked with propellers so cannot help you with that question so good. I know from aircraft engines there are some efficiency coefficients but don't know if they can also be used for ship propellers.
When searching in Wikipedia you'll find that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propeller
So I would say try to search in the internet or some smart books about that field of study and you should find some equations you can use to calculate the efficiency of your propellers to compare them.
You should also consider to use the best variants of your designs in a cavitation calculation since high effiency is only useful if the energy savings are not wasted due to high maintenance costs from damaged propeller blades.

Regards,
Boris
Boris_M is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2013, 14:28
Default
  #6
New Member
 
samir
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Algeria
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
samir_cfd is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to samir_cfd Send a message via Skype™ to samir_cfd
Good day Burak
I am simulating flow around Seiun Maru Highly skewed propeller using sliding mesh technique . the solution converge well but I think I have problems in resultes found after the simulation using Fluent. The thrust is higher annd the pathlines are not normal. Please could you help in this field
samir_cfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2013, 07:18
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Boris Marovic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11
Boris_M is on a distinguished road
Hi Samir,

I think you are in the wrong Forum. Your question about Fluent should be posted in the Fuent Forum not the FloEFD/SW Flow Simulation Froum. That's a different software and you will probably not get the help you want here.

Regards,
Boris
Boris_M is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Models for ship hydrodynamic analysis jsaelices STAR-CCM+ 5 March 13, 2010 15:50
Propeller analysis raghu_malnad Main CFD Forum 0 April 28, 2009 06:23
Propeller Analysis Raghunandan K.V. Main CFD Forum 2 January 13, 2009 03:22
does anyone analysis the hydrodynamic performance? dongtao FLUENT 0 February 26, 2006 10:29
Propeller thrust at diff. advance ratio (CFX 5.7) Zoltan CFX 9 April 27, 2005 08:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:20.