# Pipe Flow - Pressure Drop

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 7, 2010, 13:39 Pipe Flow - Pressure Drop #1 New Member   Daniel L Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Dear FLOW 3D users, I need to calculate the pressure drop in a pipe-fitting (90° bend), but my simulation produces a large pressure drop: In the pipe before and after the bend the pressure drop is ~50% above the theoretical calculated pressure drop (turbulent flow), and the pressure drop in the bend is way too large (+80% ). here are the settings I used for the simulation: Rectangular blocks, with ~20-35 cells/D (because of the 90° bend I can't use the cylindrical blocks) Pressure solver: GMRES (I also tried imp=1) Turbulent model: RNG (I also tried the k-epsilon model) frcof = -1 (no relevant differences by changing this value) Momentum advection: second order monotonicity preserving Thanks you for your help, Daniel

 December 9, 2010, 19:02 Mesh-Dependency w/ Turbulence Models #2 Senior Member   Jeff Burnham Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 204 Rep Power: 8 Daniel - It's most likely that you're seeing mesh-dependency for the near-wall turbulence treatment (log-law-of-the-wall). Search at www.flow3d.com for 'turbulence' to find technical notes on the turbulence models. TN-86 ("On the Implementation of 2-Equation Turbulence Models..." describes the mesh-dependency. For large-scale simulations, the error introduced near the wall is negligible, but for pipe flow where frictional drag losses are important, the error can be significant (as you've seen). You can solve the problem either by running a series of mesh-dependency simulations and looking for the 'not-too-big, not-too-small' range of cell sizes where the losses level off (see Fig. 6 in TN-86 for an example), or alternatively, you can manually estimate a good cell size as a function of a suitable dimensionless normal distance y+, which, again, is described in the Technical Note.

 December 10, 2010, 05:23 #3 New Member   Daniel L Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Hi Jeff, thanks for you reply. I followed the the instructions on TN-86 and I get much better results for the pressure drop in the pipe.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post SalvoCalvo Main CFD Forum 0 March 11, 2010 07:52 pertupd ANSYS 0 August 12, 2009 08:36 Joe A. FLUENT 2 April 23, 2007 07:50 Liouskos Jiannis Phoenics 5 February 6, 2002 13:04 James CD-adapco 10 October 11, 2001 11:19

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38.