|November 6, 2012, 01:35||
Difference of result betn Fluent & CFX simulation for S2S radiation
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3Rep Power: 6
i am simulating two co-axial cylinder having same length and two end with adiabatic condition for surface to surface radiation model. when i done the above case in fluent by considering S2S model im geting radiation heat from outer to inner surface 650 W and for the same case which was done in CFX by using monte carlo S2S model, i got radiative heat as 595 W.
By theoretical calculation i got result of 594.5 W means it is close to CFX result.
So,My query is why fluent result is deviating much from theoretical one?
Thanx in advance
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Problems on H2/air CFX simulation||xulixian||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||April 14, 2009 15:00|
|OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX||marco||Main CFD Forum||81||March 31, 2009 14:22|
|solving ocean wave with Fluent or CFX?||gholamghar||Main CFD Forum||1||March 21, 2009 13:49|
|Multiphase radiation in CFX||Luk_Fiz||CFX||5||March 17, 2009 04:51|
|Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx?||jobman||Main CFD Forum||6||July 5, 2006 15:02|