|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
hello,
I have a doubt about arrays defined in parallel udf, plz help me. Below is some of my opinion, but i don't know if that is right or not. If I defined an array in a parallel udf without using compiling directives such as #if RP_NODE, the host and all the other compute nodes would have an independent copy of the array with the same name. If a node modified some elements of the array, the other nodes would not automatically see the modification. Am i right? Last edited by supliu; March 14, 2013 at 08:32. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 197
Rep Power: 2 ![]() |
In my opinion unless you use RP_NODE or RP_HOST the changes in array would not be communicated between nodes and host.
Last edited by vasava; March 22, 2013 at 04:05. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| udf explaination | Ijaz | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 4 | May 8, 2012 04:24 |
| UDF problem | libia87 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | May 4, 2012 21:49 |
| using define mass transfer udf for cavitation | Komon | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 4 | December 20, 2011 11:30 |
| UDF carbon conversion | papteo | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | August 18, 2011 07:32 |
| Problem in Parallel UDF | Giacomo de Renzi | FLUENT | 12 | June 18, 2008 12:19 |