CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming

How to define the turbulent k near the wall ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 30, 2013, 02:27
Default How to define the turbulent k near the wall ?
  #1
New Member
 
hp
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
joy2000 is on a distinguished road
hello everyone,

I wish to define the solution of the turbulent kinematic energy solution near the wall, in Fluent.

My case is standard k-e with standard wall function.

From the ansys help we can see that the k-equation is solved in the whole domain including near the wall, while the epsilon adjacent to the wall is calculated from the near-wall equ with is derived from the local equilibrium hypothesis.

After the solution I found that the production of k (Gk) is zero everywhere on the wall, which is very different from the Gk equ based on the local equilibrium hypothesis.

I wish to give a definition of the k in order to force the local equilibrium near the wall. Could anybody give some advice how i can do this?

Many thanks!!
joy2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2013, 02:58
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 315
Rep Power: 11
blackmask will become famous soon enough
There is no fluctuation on the wall ( the velocity is always zero) so that the turbulent kinetic energy k vanishes on the wall.
blackmask is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2013, 22:54
Default
  #3
New Member
 
hp
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
joy2000 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmask View Post
There is no fluctuation on the wall ( the velocity is always zero) so that the turbulent kinetic energy k vanishes on the wall.
From the ansys help we can see the k-equation would be solved in the whole domain including the near-wall cells while the epsilon would be given by functions near the wall. The boundary condition for the k-eq is the zero normal partial differential: dk / dn =0, on the wall. (d here also means "partial differential" for that I can't type the "round" symble ) This is a Neumann boundary.


I saw in many literatures they specified the value of k on the wall, which is, to give a Diriclet boundary for the equation. For example, some can specify the k as u*^2/sqrt(Cmu), which is, to force the local equilibrium on the wall. Or some can give a zero k on the wall.

I checked the results of the Fluent on an external flow around a cylinder with k-e and standard wall function. When I compared the computed k to the "u*^2/sqrt(Cmu)" , I saw in the wake region the computed value differed a lot. I wonder whether this would be a key point to cause the differences between my results and those in the literatures.

So I wish to specify the k on the wall, in the Fluent, eg. though a UDF~~

Could anybody shed some light~~

turb k.jpg
joy2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulent cyclic pipe flow, wall functions and y+ clyde OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 March 17, 2014 07:08
what is the 'Wall Turbulent Prandtl Number'? begginer FLUENT 2 October 1, 2013 22:42
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent romekr ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 November 26, 2011 13:11
Define wall using UDF Abhijit FLUENT 3 October 26, 2007 10:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53.