|July 9, 2009, 06:37||
gradient source term UDF
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 80Rep Power: 6
I have a user defined scalar for a variable Q, and a user defined scalar for a variable V. In the scalar equation for Q, a source term appears as follows:
where the variable Q appears as a source term for the user defined scalar equation for V as (Q/constant). Everything works beautifully when I turn this source term (eq 1) OFF.
The way I implemented this source term (equation 1) is within a DEFINE_SOURCE function as
and the solution diverges. I am pretty sure this is because of a checkerboarding effect as with pressure-velocity coupling. I therefore probably need to manually discretise the source term in the FLUENT UDF environment...how can I access north,south,west and east nodal positions so that I can do this in 2D?? and later in 3D? is this even possible in fluent?? This has been troubling me for quite some time now...any help is appreciated.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|UDF source term||Rajani Kanth.B||Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming||4||May 1, 2013 09:31|
|The source term of UDF||summer||FLUENT||0||August 24, 2006 17:44|
|PDE in udf for defining momentum source term||shekhar||FLUENT||0||April 12, 2004 01:43|
|HELP! adding a mass source to VOF eqn. by UDF???||ROOZBEH||FLUENT||4||May 29, 2003 09:54|
|a question about UDF for source term||winnie||FLUENT||1||May 2, 2003 09:11|