|June 23, 2010, 04:58||
Defining UDS at interface, Boundary Zone Walls Sliding Mesh
Join Date: Jun 2009
Blog Entries: 1Rep Power: 7
I'm running a Rushton Turbine simulation, and created 2 extra transport equations using UDS. Using MRF I have good results but as soon as I switch to SM, my UDS values at the interface are reduced significantly. I think is because when Fluent creates the interface, it also creates extra Boundary Zones, in my case are Walls. At these walls the UDS values needs to be specified. At the moment I've left them with Specified Flux=0 as I did with MRF condition. But it seems that this condition is affecting the information transfered through the interface.
Any Ideas on how to overcome this issue?
|boundary zones, interface, mrf, sliding mesh, uds|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Moving mesh||Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom)||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||122||June 15, 2014 06:20|
|CFX doesn't continue calculation...||mactech001||CFX||6||November 15, 2009 21:25|
|TGridFluent mesh with internal by prism layer and internal face for diagnostic||sponiar||OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ...||2||March 30, 2009 15:02|
|Location of interface for sliding mesh||Gopal||FLUENT||1||July 14, 2005 04:30|
|How to control Minximum mesh space?||hung||FLUENT||7||April 18, 2005 09:38|