
[Sponsors] 
April 20, 2012, 07:38 
Convergence of Cyclone Analysis

#1 
Member
arjun
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tokyo, JAPAN
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 6 
Hi all,
I did the analysis of Cyclone separators and I found monitor of mass flow rate at outlet is fluctuating. please see the attachment. Is the solution converged? 

April 20, 2012, 16:08 

#2 
Senior Member
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 1,306
Rep Power: 20 
Sorry but, please define solution convergence and that will answer your question. What are you considering a converged solution? What are your convergence criteria? No one else but you should be telling you if your solution is converged, since it is up to you to determine the convergence criteria.


April 24, 2012, 17:41 

#3 
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 9 
There are fluctuations, but they seem very small within this range
I would look for the following in a converged simulation: 1) mass is conserved (e.g. same mass flux coming in and exiting the domain) 2) generally speaking, all residuals decrease smoothly below some low value 3) if no energy is added to the flow, total temperature on all exits should add up to the total inlet temperature, meaning (m_dot_in * T_in = m_dot_1 * T_1 + m_dot_2 * T_2 + ... ) 4) mass/temperature/velocity etc outlet monitors should occupy a stable numerical value when plotted over a sizeable range of iterations Hope this helps 

April 24, 2012, 17:44 

#4 
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 9 
On the image m_dot has been plotted over the last 90 cycles. It is best for one to plot a monitor over a large range of cycles (in your case, say, 3000  4000, as an example) in order to see how this monitor has been behaving throughout a sizeable part of the simulation.


April 25, 2012, 01:28 

#5 
Member
arjun
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tokyo, JAPAN
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 6 
Thanks for your help,
My residuals are fluctuating in cyclic manner, from one research paper i found that the solution must be changed to transient one. i dint know how to decide the time step and if i run transient run then how should i know that my solution is converged, and how to analyse the final results of transient run. Thank You... 

April 25, 2012, 01:50 

#6  
Senior Member
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 1,306
Rep Power: 20 
Quote:
For transient run, your timestep should be small enough to resolve the main flow structures (the unsteady features). If the unsteady feature has a timescale of say 1s, then some fraction of 1s is needed or you will not resolve the unsteady features. Less than 1/3 is recommended, 1/10 or more if you want to be safe. Again, you need to know beforehand what the timescale of these features are, do not do it blindly or you will only get lost! If you don't know these timescales then you probably do not need to be doing a transient simulation yet. Your solution must be converged at the current timestep before you can move to the next one. Hence, it is even more important that you define convergence well beforehand. If you find that it is taking too many iterations to converge at the current timestep, you can reduce your timestep size. You will end up computing more timesteps but it will make it easier to converge each timestep. If your solution converges easily then consider increasing the timestep size (as long as you can still resolve the unsteady features using the 1/3 or 1/10 guideline). Additionally, typically the timestep is also sometimes chosen to satisfy stability criteria (checkout CFL number). 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Convergence  Centurion2011  FLUENT  29  August 27, 2016 03:19 
Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem  Sal  FLUENT  8  December 17, 2014 08:46 
Force can not converge  colopolo  CFX  13  October 4, 2011 22:03 
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis  nasdak  CFX  2  June 29, 2009 01:17 
help! cyclone convergence question  Lcw  FLUENT  1  January 26, 2005 16:29 