CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Convergence of Cyclone Analysis

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 20, 2012, 07:38
Default Convergence of Cyclone Analysis
  #1
Member
 
arjun
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tokyo, JAPAN
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 5
arjun3020 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I did the analysis of Cyclone separators and I found monitor of mass flow rate at outlet is fluctuating.
please see the attachment.
Is the solution converged?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (39.3 KB, 50 views)
arjun3020 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 2012, 16:08
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 449
Rep Power: 10
LuckyTran is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjun3020 View Post
Hi all,

I did the analysis of Cyclone separators and I found monitor of mass flow rate at outlet is fluctuating.
please see the attachment.
Is the solution converged?
Sorry but, please define solution convergence and that will answer your question. What are you considering a converged solution? What are your convergence criteria? No one else but you should be telling you if your solution is converged, since it is up to you to determine the convergence criteria.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 24, 2012, 17:41
Default
  #3
jpo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 7
jpo is on a distinguished road
There are fluctuations, but they seem very small within this range

I would look for the following in a converged simulation:

1) mass is conserved (e.g. same mass flux coming in and exiting the domain)

2) generally speaking, all residuals decrease smoothly below some low value

3) if no energy is added to the flow, total temperature on all exits should add up to the total inlet temperature, meaning (m_dot_in * T_in = m_dot_1 * T_1 + m_dot_2 * T_2 + ... )

4) mass/temperature/velocity etc outlet monitors should occupy a stable numerical value when plotted over a sizeable range of iterations

Hope this helps
jpo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 24, 2012, 17:44
Default
  #4
jpo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 7
jpo is on a distinguished road
On the image m_dot has been plotted over the last 90 cycles. It is best for one to plot a monitor over a large range of cycles (in your case, say, 3000 - 4000, as an example) in order to see how this monitor has been behaving throughout a sizeable part of the simulation.
jpo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 25, 2012, 01:28
Default
  #5
Member
 
arjun
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tokyo, JAPAN
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 5
arjun3020 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your help,

My residuals are fluctuating in cyclic manner,
from one research paper i found that the solution must be changed to transient one.
i dint know how to decide the time step and if i run transient run then how should i know that my solution is converged, and how to analyse the final results of transient run.


Thank You...
arjun3020 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 25, 2012, 01:50
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 449
Rep Power: 10
LuckyTran is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjun3020 View Post
Thanks for your help,

My residuals are fluctuating in cyclic manner,
from one research paper i found that the solution must be changed to transient one.
i dint know how to decide the time step and if i run transient run then how should i know that my solution is converged, and how to analyse the final results of transient run.


Thank You...
arjun, do not take it lightly, but my greatest suggestion to you is to first decide how you are going to judge convergence before anything. You need to begin the problem with an end in mind or else you will never be able to decide when to stop. Again, you are the one that ultimately decides convergence! If you can never decide then you will never finish. You do not want to blindly follow others' advice on this, you need to convince yourself!

For transient run, your time-step should be small enough to resolve the main flow structures (the unsteady features). If the unsteady feature has a time-scale of say 1s, then some fraction of 1s is needed or you will not resolve the unsteady features. Less than 1/3 is recommended, 1/10 or more if you want to be safe. Again, you need to know beforehand what the time-scale of these features are, do not do it blindly or you will only get lost! If you don't know these time-scales then you probably do not need to be doing a transient simulation yet.

Your solution must be converged at the current time-step before you can move to the next one. Hence, it is even more important that you define convergence well beforehand. If you find that it is taking too many iterations to converge at the current time-step, you can reduce your time-step size. You will end up computing more time-steps but it will make it easier to converge each time-step. If your solution converges easily then consider increasing the time-step size (as long as you can still resolve the unsteady features using the 1/3 or 1/10 guideline).

Additionally, typically the time-step is also sometimes chosen to satisfy stability criteria (check-out CFL number).
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convergence Centurion2011 FLUENT 19 February 3, 2014 12:07
Force can not converge colopolo CFX 13 October 4, 2011 22:03
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis nasdak CFX 2 June 29, 2009 01:17
Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem Sal FLUENT 6 July 28, 2007 01:53
help! cyclone convergence question Lcw FLUENT 1 January 26, 2005 15:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39.