CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Help--how to define outlet boundary condition?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 24, 2012, 17:12
Default Help--how to define outlet boundary condition?
  #1
New Member
 
guoji xu
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 5
gxu2 is on a distinguished road


Hi,everyone.

I want to simulate 2 D Stokes wave using fluent 13, the result is shown in the picture. In this picture, several waves are good in the first half of flume, but at the second half of the flume, the waves dissipate so rapidly. I don't know why.
I am wondering should I define a pressure profile udf to define the outlet?
Could anybody give some advice? Thanks in advance!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg QQ??20120407145447.jpg (41.9 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg QQ??20120407230952.jpg (37.3 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg QQ??20120408003424.jpg (37.4 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg QQ??20120408075245.jpg (37.5 KB, 19 views)
gxu2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2012, 02:45
Default
  #2
Member
 
James Willie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 8
jwillie2000 is on a distinguished road
Hi, Can you throw more light on your problem? Like is the flow turbulent? I would assume no? and did you introduce any disturbance at the inlet in the velocity, etc? Jimmy
jwillie2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2012, 09:47
Default
  #3
New Member
 
guoji xu
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 5
gxu2 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwillie2000 View Post
Hi, Can you throw more light on your problem? Like is the flow turbulent? I would assume no? and did you introduce any disturbance at the inlet in the velocity, etc? Jimmy
Thank you very much for helping me, my friend!

Actually, the flow is laminar flow, without any turbulent at the inlet velocity profile. the boudary conditions are velocity inlet, bottom--no slipping wall, top--no slipping wall, outlet--out flow.

Should I define a pressure udf for the out flow?

Thank you very much again.
gxu2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2012, 10:52
Default
  #4
Member
 
James Willie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 8
jwillie2000 is on a distinguished road
It means u defined a velocity profile at the inlet? Am I getting you right? If yes, then you need to just need to increase the amplitude of the disturbance or flutuation in your velocity profile. The code is probably damping the wave and this is likely numerical. Make sure you do grid dependency test to remove any ambiguity. Jimmy
jwillie2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2012, 11:05
Default
  #5
New Member
 
guoji xu
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 5
gxu2 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwillie2000 View Post
It means u defined a velocity profile at the inlet? Am I getting you right? If yes, then you need to just need to increase the amplitude of the disturbance or flutuation in your velocity profile. The code is probably damping the wave and this is likely numerical. Make sure you do grid dependency test to remove any ambiguity. Jimmy
Yes, I defined a velociy profile for the velociy inlet. but you could see all the photos I uploaded, which could tell that the inlet wave profile is good, but when propagating, the wave profile changes. It seems my velocity inlet udf is right, maybe it does not need to adjust the disturbance or flutuation in my velociy profile. Do you think so?

Thank you, Jimmy!
gxu2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 06:41
Default
  #6
Member
 
James Willie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 8
jwillie2000 is on a distinguished road
Hi, is your profile at the inlet a function? sin or cosine? and if yes, what is the amplitude? I suspect the amplitude is not large enough and so it is being damped? so play with that and see. because you are using the euler euqation, we should not have any damping due to viscous effects. If there is then it is numerical. That is why i am asking about whether you did any grid dependency test? Jimmy
jwillie2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 07:33
Default
  #7
Member
 
Daniel Tanner
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 8
Daniel Tanner is on a distinguished road
Might be worth trying the pressure outlet boundary condition (instead of the outflow condition). The outflow condition may not be suitable for this application (it assumes fully developed conditions at the outlet).
Daniel Tanner is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 11:16
Default
  #8
New Member
 
guoji xu
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 5
gxu2 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwillie2000 View Post
Hi, is your profile at the inlet a function? sin or cosine? and if yes, what is the amplitude? I suspect the amplitude is not large enough and so it is being damped? so play with that and see. because you are using the euler euqation, we should not have any damping due to viscous effects. If there is then it is numerical. That is why i am asking about whether you did any grid dependency test? Jimmy
For my case, VOF method is employed. inlet profile cosists of U-velocity, V-velocity, and volume fraction factor function. it is second Stokes wave, all the function is defined according to Stokes Second Theory. I didn't enlarge the amplitude.

One small question, could you explain what is grid dependency test? you mean try different grid meshing?

Thank you very much! Happy Memorial Day!
gxu2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 11:22
Default
  #9
New Member
 
guoji xu
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 5
gxu2 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Tanner View Post
Might be worth trying the pressure outlet boundary condition (instead of the outflow condition). The outflow condition may not be suitable for this application (it assumes fully developed conditions at the outlet).
Thank you for your advice. I will try it.
gxu2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 11:23
Default
  #10
Member
 
James Willie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 8
jwillie2000 is on a distinguished road
Hi, And thanks for the wishes. About grid dependency test. You have a case where the waves you have in your flow are dissipating quickly than expected. The qauestions is is it physical or non-phsical or numerical? To remove the third case, you try have to do grid dependency test. Like you said you need to vary your mesh resolution till you have no change in your critical variable of interest. It could be the pressure or velocity or temperature in a given section or boundary of your flow. When that happens, you can reliably say that the results you are getting are void of any numerical artifacts and therefore must be due to the physics of the flow. In the case you have right now it would be difficult to say. Good luck! James
jwillie2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 11:26
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 918
Rep Power: 15
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by gxu2 View Post
For my case, VOF method is employed. inlet profile cosists of U-velocity, V-velocity, and volume fraction factor function. it is second Stokes wave, all the function is defined according to Stokes Second Theory. I didn't enlarge the amplitude.

One small question, could you explain what is grid dependency test? you mean try different grid meshing?

Thank you very much! Happy Memorial Day!
Yes, grid dependency test means trying different meshes: start from a coarse mesh and test other finer meshes, and stop when your results don't change to much from a grid to another.

Daniele

EDIT: ok, jwillie was faster
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 11:40
Default
  #12
New Member
 
guoji xu
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 5
gxu2 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwillie2000 View Post
Hi, And thanks for the wishes. About grid dependency test. You have a case where the waves you have in your flow are dissipating quickly than expected. The qauestions is is it physical or non-phsical or numerical? To remove the third case, you try have to do grid dependency test. Like you said you need to vary your mesh resolution till you have no change in your critical variable of interest. It could be the pressure or velocity or temperature in a given section or boundary of your flow. When that happens, you can reliably say that the results you are getting are void of any numerical artifacts and therefore must be due to the physics of the flow. In the case you have right now it would be difficult to say. Good luck! James
Please excuse me for my little knowledge about "Physical or non-physical", I appreciate your insightful further explaination. Does it bother you too much?
gxu2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 11:41
Default
  #13
New Member
 
guoji xu
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 5
gxu2 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost82 View Post
Yes, grid dependency test means trying different meshes: start from a coarse mesh and test other finer meshes, and stop when your results don't change to much from a grid to another.

Daniele

EDIT: ok, jwillie was faster
Thank you for your kind-hearted reply. May God bless you!
gxu2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2012, 13:15
Default
  #14
Member
 
James Willie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 8
jwillie2000 is on a distinguished road
Hi, Not sure if your question is already answered about physical or non-physical? Physical is whether the phenomenon you are observing or your results can be attributed to physics or reality or not. Some of them are numerical or non-physical...meaning it cannot be attributed to physics and sometimes simply does not hold. Hope it helps. Jimmy
jwillie2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 34 October 16, 2014 05:27
How to set the Heat Flux boundary condition at Outlet creddy_trddc CFX 3 September 21, 2011 07:44
Setting outlet Pressure boundary condition using CAFFA code Mukund Pondkule Main CFD Forum 0 March 16, 2011 04:23
define boundary condition in just one cell face om1234 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 June 16, 2010 19:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56.