CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

FLUENT changes my boundary conditions setup (2D transonic compressor airfoil)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 27, 2012, 13:14
Default FLUENT changes my boundary conditions setup (2D transonic compressor airfoil)
  #1
New Member
 
Andrea
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
the_knife is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I'm working on my thesis and I have to simulate an airfoil of a transonic compressor. I have got all the thermodynamic parameters at the inlet and outlet.
I set up the boundary conditions, but after the run this values are different.
I try to explain better. For example I set up a pressure inlet condition with a P_tot = 101350 Pa and P_stat = 56000 Pa (Ma around 0.99).
After the simulation the P_stat at the inlet is 96000 and do the Mach is different.
I've tried all the possible combination of boundary conditions, and always something change.

I don't know how to solve this problem.

Thank you

Andrea
the_knife is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2012, 14:09
Default
  #2
Administrator
 
pete's Avatar
 
Peter Jones
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 684
Rep Power: 10
pete will become famous soon enough
You should set Ptot on the inlet and Pstat on the outlet, not both at the inlet.
pete is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2012, 15:08
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Andrea
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
the_knife is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the sunday answer :-).

The thing is that fixing P_tot and P_stat I fix also the Mach number.
The value that I have in both inlet and outlet are P_tot P_stat and Mach number. I don't know which is the best combination of boundary condition for my simulation.
I fixed both P_tot and P_stat because in this way I also fixed the Mach number.
the_knife is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2012, 15:13
Default
  #4
Administrator
 
pete's Avatar
 
Peter Jones
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 684
Rep Power: 10
pete will become famous soon enough
Defining Ptot and Ma number on the inlet only is not a complete boundary condition. What do you specify at the outlet?
pete is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2012, 15:35
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Andrea
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
the_knife is on a distinguished road
Ok, I'm surprised to see that there are a lot of people available on sunday :-).

This is what I have:
INLET:
- Ma,Ptot,Pstat,Direction of flow,Ttot
OUTLET:
-Ma,Ptot,Pstat,Ttot

I've tried to use for example this configuration:
INLET: pressure inlet with Ptot, Pstat and direction of the flow
OUTLET: pressure outlet with Pstat.
The problem is that after the simulation the Pstat is totally different from my initial Pstat set up.
the_knife is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2012, 15:49
Default
  #6
Administrator
 
pete's Avatar
 
Peter Jones
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 684
Rep Power: 10
pete will become famous soon enough
That is way too many boundary conditions. The simulation is over-determined. The most common and most stable boundary condition for compressible flows is to set Ptot, Ttot and direction of flow at the inlet and Pstat at the outlet.
pete is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2012, 16:20
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Andrea
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
the_knife is on a distinguished road
Ok, thank you very much. I will try this evening and I will tell you.
Thank you very much.

Andrea
the_knife is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2012, 17:30
Default
  #8
Administrator
 
pete's Avatar
 
Peter Jones
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 684
Rep Power: 10
pete will become famous soon enough
If you do not get the desired inlet Ma number you should adjust the outlet Pstat. The change needed can be estimated with simple compressible isentropic flow relations for Ma, Ptot and Pstat. Look them up in a textbook if you do not know them or check out CFD-Wiki which has a bit here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Isent...flow_relations
pete is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2012, 19:37
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Andrea
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
the_knife is on a distinguished road
I know the isentropic relationship. In fact, I thought that setting both the P_stat and P_tot I was able to fix also the Ma.

I'm tring to change a bit the value of the outlet pressure to see what happens.

Thank you

Andrea
the_knife is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 45 February 8, 2016 05:42
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
How to give velocity and temperature gradient's type of boundary conditions in fluent Kishorechand Main CFD Forum 0 April 4, 2012 05:01
Fluent accuracy and boundary conditions Paolo Lampitella FLUENT 0 June 12, 2008 06:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:05.