|July 16, 2012, 15:17||
Mesh size for turbulence modeling
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 57Rep Power: 6
Good day everyone!
I try to simulate fully developed turbulent flow (k-e RNG model, enhanced wall function because of 1<y+<5 in FLUENT y+ contours). But I have only two-three finite-volume cells at boundary layer, instead of 10-12. Is the last requirement strict and I've got wrong simulation results?
|July 16, 2012, 16:19||
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,104Rep Power: 19
With y+ around 1, it is highly recommended to have a sufficient number of prism layers to resolve the boundary layer.
If you only have 3 prism layers and y+ is around 1, then the prism cells only cover the viscous sublayer of the bondary layer.
The rest of the boundary layer will be poorly resolved and the results will suffer from the increased numerical diffusion in an unstructured mesh (assuming your mesh is not of the stuctured hexahedral type)
2-3 Cells might be ok when using scalable wall functions with y+ around 60, but not in this case.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|[ICEM] Help with fixing imported IGES model||siw||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||24||August 24, 2010 11:22|
|OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found||piprus||OpenFOAM Installation||22||February 25, 2010 14:43|
|Gambit Unstructed (Tet) Mesh - size control||newbie||FLUENT||3||August 26, 2008 11:38|
|fluent add additional zones for the mesh file||SSL||FLUENT||2||January 26, 2008 12:55|
|Convergence moving mesh||lr103476||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||30||November 19, 2007 15:09|