 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
July 17, 2012, 08:17
|
evaporation of combusting particles, DPM
|
#1 |
|
New Member
sadjad
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 3  |
Hello all,
I'm modelling coal combustion using DPM model. This is the data i got: number tracked = 3770, escaped = 2736, aborted = 0, trapped = 0, evaporated = 0, incomplete = 1034 which seems unreasonable 'cause no evaporation has occured!  What does "evaporated" actually mean? Are combusted solid particles of coals accounted into "evaporated"? Thank you all, sadjad. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| combustion, dpm, evaporated, fluent |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Injection of specific number of particles in DPM | DH | FLUENT | 11 | October 20, 2011 07:50 |
| Constant & independent velocity for DPM particles | Wikie | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | September 23, 2010 05:35 |
| DPM - do the particles affect the liquid? | Nikhil Dani | FLUENT | 0 | January 1, 2009 11:58 |
| DPM Modelling: Colloid droplet evaporation | Meng Wai Woo | FLUENT | 1 | August 1, 2007 00:27 |
| DPM - Why do the particles not vanish? | Johannes | FLUENT | 12 | July 6, 2007 11:19 |
Linear Mode
