|July 27, 2012, 01:24||
Fundamental Question about Rotating wall!
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 46Rep Power: 7
suppose we want to model a 3-bladed fan in a duct. I konw that we have to use either:
-SRF (MRF when duct is not surface of revolution)
My simple(!) question is:
why we cant just use moving wall boundary condition for the fan blades? i.e. no need to define rotating frame or ....
I think if the the rotating wall was axissymmetric like a cylinder or a disk, then it would be reasonable. Am I right?
Thanks in advance for your reply!
|July 27, 2012, 02:58||
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,266Rep Power: 22
You are right. Simply applying a rotating wall boundary condition only works if the wall is a surface of revolution (of course with the same axis of rotation).
This is not applicable if the wall is not a surface of revolution because in this case, the wall would acually move through the fluid domain.
This is not possible.
An immersed boundary would be another option for a rotating body.
|moving wall, mrf, srf|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help!||Yr0gErG||FLUENT||3||June 12, 2013 02:12|
|UDF for wall slipping||HFLUENT||Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming||0||April 27, 2011 12:03|
|Rotating Wall||ata||OpenFOAM||6||November 27, 2009 22:28|
|rotating wall||eric||FLUENT||2||November 27, 2003 03:30|
|rotating wall||eric||FLUENT||8||September 20, 2003 17:49|