# Volume flow rate through actuator disk (Tidal turbine)

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 23, 2012, 11:58 Volume flow rate through actuator disk (Tidal turbine) #1 Member   Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 42 Rep Power: 7 Hi, I´m modelling an array of 3 marine current turbines using a porous jump boundary condition. The domain is a rectangular channel with 650. length, 400m width and 100m depth. Hub height is 30m from the bottom. Porous jump parameters are the same for the 3 turbines and are set to represent a thrust coeff. = 0.8. Parameter values are: - Face permeability, m²: 1e+10 - Porous medium thickness, m: 0.5 - Pressure Jum Coeff. C2, 1/m: 25 Solution converges after 260 iterations. Follows a figure showing velocity magnitude contours at hub height horizontal plane. When I generate the reports for Volumetric and Mass Flow Rates for each turbine, I get negative values for side turbines and a positive value for center turbine. Values are as follows: Volumetric Flow Rate (m3/s) -------------------------------- -------------------- (Up) Turbine-1 -37.982517 (Center) Turbine-2 90.828041 (Down) Turbine-3 -38.849861 ---------------- ------------------------ Net 13.995665 Mass Flow Rate (kg/s) -------------------------------- -------------------- (Up) Turbine-1 -38932.082 (Center) Turbine-2 93098.742 (Down) Turbine-3 -39821.109 ---------------- ------------------------- Net 14345.555 But surface velocity integral are very similar for each disk. Does anyone knows why this is happening and how can I obtain real values? Thanks in adavance.

 August 11, 2013, 15:49 #2 New Member   Derek Foran Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 5 Hi, I was wondering how you managed to figure out the required pressure jump c2 coefficient of 25? I am modelling a similar tidal turbine problem and not sure what the appropriate porous jump parameters would be to model a turbine with 35% efficiency. Thanks! Derek

 August 12, 2013, 10:27 #3 Member   Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 42 Rep Power: 7 Hi Derek, The values of C2 = 25/m and a porous medium thickness of 0.5m are incorrect. I took thos values from a scientific paper, but now I disagree. The best way to calculate C2 is using actuator disk theory. In order to do the calculations you need to assum some initial values like, free stream velocity, power coefficient and medium thickness. The procedure will be: 1 - For a given power coefficient you can find out the related axial induction factor, a. 2 - With a you get the velocity at the wake, Uw. Uw = Uo(1-2a). 3 - Knowing the free stream velocity and wake velocity you calculate the pressure jump. 4 - Finally, with the pressure difference at both sides of the disk you can apply equation 7.3-69 (http://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flue...ug/node256.htm) and calculate C2. Note that the velocity in equation 7.3-69 corresponds to the flow velocity at the disk, Ud, Ud = Uo(1-a). Once you do the run with Fluent you can check your result. By applying this methodology I get a difference with teory of 4.4%. I hope I've helped you. Regards, Eduardo WhiteB likes this.

 August 12, 2013, 12:24 #4 New Member   Derek Foran Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 5 Thanks Eduardo this is great! Really appreciate the help

 August 12, 2013, 15:18 #5 New Member   Derek Foran Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 5 Hi Eduardo, After calculating using the steps you gave me I got a c2 value of 0.5 with assumed thickness of 1 m. Is this within a similar range to the value you found? Thanks Derek

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post beguxa FLUENT 4 June 8, 2013 16:17 Zigainer FLUENT 10 January 5, 2013 22:51 jjchristophe Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 1 July 13, 2010 04:23 saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07 Jason Qiu Main CFD Forum 0 October 20, 2002 02:34

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48.