CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

why in fluent report the skin friction coefficient is positive

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 25, 2012, 07:32
Default why in fluent report the skin friction coefficient is positive
  #1
New Member
 
Amir
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14
gomnam15010 is on a distinguished road
hi.
why in fluent report the skin friction coefficient is positive in everywhere of separation zone?! while in separation zone the skin friction coefficient must be negative.
please help me
thanks for your attention
gomnam15010 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2012, 07:44
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20
cfd seeker is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomnam15010 View Post
hi.
why in fluent report the skin friction coefficient is positive in everywhere of separation zone?! while in separation zone the skin friction coefficient must be negative.
please help me
thanks for your attention
Skin friction coefficient is always positive and what do you mean by separation zone?
cfd seeker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2012, 08:32
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Gonzalo
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Argentina
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 16
gfoam is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomnam15010 View Post
hi.
why in fluent report the skin friction coefficient is positive in everywhere of separation zone?! while in separation zone the skin friction coefficient must be negative.
please help me
thanks for your attention
Be careful, because the criterion of skin friction (Cf) equals cero (not negative) to find flow separation only aplies when you have a 2D case like a 2D airfoil or a cylinder, but not in 3D cases like a wing.
gfoam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2012, 09:27
Default please help me
  #4
New Member
 
Amir
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14
gomnam15010 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfd seeker View Post
Skin friction coefficient is always positive and what do you mean by separation zone?

in the separation zone the velocity gradiant is negative and so the skin friction coefficient must be negative
gomnam15010 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2012, 10:01
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Gonzalo
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Argentina
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 16
gfoam is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomnam15010 View Post
in the separation zone the velocity gradiant is negative and so the skin friction coefficient must be negative
But in which reference frame the velocity gradient is negative? May be FLUENT calculates the Cf with the absolute value of the wall shear, may be you must look at the components of wall shear and see if there is separation or not. regards
Gonzalo
gfoam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2012, 10:37
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 2,149
Blog Entries: 29
Rep Power: 39
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
The total wall shear stress used by fluent in defining the skin friction coefficient is, of course, a positive definite quantity (it is the magnitude of the total stress). Do what Gonzalo said and you will find what you're looking for.
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2013, 02:27
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Manu Kamin
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 14
manukamin is on a distinguished road
I'm having the same problem here. The velocity vectors over the airfoil surface is clearly reversed(flow reversal). But then the skin friction coefficient plot is positive everywhere.

I understand the possibility that Fluent might be using only the magnitude of wall shear stress to calculate the skin friction, hence it being positive everywhere. But of course, it is physically incorrect.

So is there any option in Fluent by which I can get the actual physical skin friction coefficient plot?
manukamin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2013, 03:22
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,395
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
It is not physically incorrect.

The skin friction coefficient based on the wall sheat stress magnitude has to be positive.
If you want negative values in recirculation zones, you will have to evaluate the components of the wall shear stress.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2013, 05:48
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Manu Kamin
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 14
manukamin is on a distinguished road
Hi Alex,

Thanks for the response. However, Fluent seems to ignore the sign of even the wall shear stress. So there is no way for me to even evaluate cf from the wall shear stress by myself too. So how can I obtain negative cf in recirculation zones?
manukamin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2013, 06:33
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,395
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by manukamin View Post
However, Fluent seems to ignore the sign of even the wall shear stress
I know for a fact that the streamwise component of the wall shear stress changes sign in a recirculation zone in reality and in fluent aswell.
What exactly are you simulating? Please post a picture of your setup with the orientation of the coordinate axes.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2013, 09:36
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 421
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 21
blackmask will become famous soon enough
The wall shear stress is a a vector, it should have two components, say x-wall-shear & y-wall-shear in 2D simulation and three components in 3D simulation. Maybe there is something called "wall stress" which actually is the magnitude of wall stress vector, then you should look into the stress vector instead.

Fluent does do funny things. It reports the magnitude instead of the z-component of vorticity in 2D simulation.



Quote:
Originally Posted by manukamin View Post
Hi Alex,

Thanks for the response. However, Fluent seems to ignore the sign of even the wall shear stress. So there is no way for me to even evaluate cf from the wall shear stress by myself too. So how can I obtain negative cf in recirculation zones?
blackmask is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2013, 09:04
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Manu Kamin
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 14
manukamin is on a distinguished road
Hi Alex and Blackmask,

I'm simulating a flow problem in a 2-D compressor cascade. Hence my upper and lower walls are periodic.

I have attached an image of my meshed domain. Now the thing is that the wall shear stress is shown to be positive everywhere as per fluent (complete and not x and y). But I see that there are some recirculation zones when i plot the velocity vectors. Does that make sense? Or should I individually plot x and y wall shear stress?

I'm not sure how to display the co ordinate system. In Fluent are X and Y directions are as per a fixed global co -ordinate system or is it a local co-ordinate system that varies from point to point in which x is in the streamwise direction and y in the normal direction?

I think answer to this would answer my question.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg periodic.jpg (51.3 KB, 137 views)
manukamin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2013, 20:40
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 421
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 21
blackmask will become famous soon enough
X- and Y- directions are global coordinate system. The wall shear in Fluent is the magnitude of wall shear stress vector so that it is always positive. But the shear should approach to zero near the separation point. Then you can do a xy-plot to verify whether that the x-wall-shear change its sign around that point.
blackmask is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2013, 02:27
Default
  #14
New Member
 
Manu Kamin
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 14
manukamin is on a distinguished road
Well then my problem still persists! There is no way I can know if there is a recirculation zone if the shear stress plotted is always positive. Of course x and y shear stresses do have magnitude as well as a sign. But what's the point? They are as per a global co ordinate system. Since each element of my airfoil is oriented at a unique angle, there is no way that the x and y shear stress can tell me anything about streamwise and stream-normal shear stress.

Unless, I create a custom function that resolves the x and y shear stress into streamwise and stream normal vectors at each element along the airfoil surface (wall).. But I'm not sure how to do that on Fluent.
manukamin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2013, 02:46
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 421
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 21
blackmask will become famous soon enough
No, you don't have to do that. The skin friction goes to zero around the seperation point, so does its components and vice versa. You only need to guarentee that the transformation between the airfoil and the coordinate is non-singular. From the figure you provided above, the x-coordinate should well serve your purpose.
blackmask is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
fluent 6.3.26, positive, skin friction coefficient

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fluent Good Lift coefficient BAD drag coefficient Rif Main CFD Forum 4 March 9, 2010 11:52
drag coefficient of cylinder using fluent john lynam Main CFD Forum 2 February 15, 2010 10:16
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 09:43
Determinig Skin Coefficient Priyank Main CFD Forum 0 December 20, 2005 03:16
drawing curved line,plotting skin friction lines Alex Main CFD Forum 0 November 16, 2005 21:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11.