CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (
-   FLUENT (
-   -   Mesh dependency - possible that refinement = worse results? (

crisgc November 14, 2012 08:46

Mesh dependency - possible that refinement = worse results?
Hi everyone,

I am simulating a simple jet breakup, laminar flow, issuing from a capillary nozzle applying an oscillatory boundary condition to achieve breakup. The study is 2D axisymmetric. It seems that I obtain good results with a fine mesh (aprox. 40000 elements) when I compare them with experimental cases but if I refine the grid even more (100000 elements or further) the results are worse and I cannot even produce the breakup and the interface seems quite different to what it should look like (tiny ripples appear).

Any suggestion? Is it possible that refining the mesh led to worse results?

Thank you for your help!

RodriguezFatz November 14, 2012 09:35

Yes, this is possible. You must generally be careful if your result changes when you refine the grid. This is a problem of "solving the equations right".
When your results - compared to experiments - become worse due to refinement, this can be a problem of "solving the right equations". In your case, it is possible that your results are "accidentally correct". The numerical error cancels the model error. This does not mean, that the results are good. It is just some kind of random incident.

crisgc November 14, 2012 09:43

Wow! Curious!

Thank you RodriguezFatz for your reply! One question, what do you mean by "the numerical error cancels the model error"? That I am using the wrong solver / algorithms but the error associated to the numerical method used makes the solution to seem right?

What makes me wonder (and become a bit nervious) about how to solve it! I am using a VOF (usually + Level Set) and I wouldn't know what other model to use for that kind of problem. Could you recommend me anything?

Thank you once more!

RodriguezFatz November 14, 2012 09:53

More or less: I meant, that a bad grid (as a source of numerical error) can cancel the error that the model (as a source of error compared to reality) produces. Then, the solution seems to be right, but isn't.

Can you afford even more refinement? If it is possible, you should try at least two stages of refinement of the grid (allways!). Now have a look at how your relevant values change over the three grids. If you are allready in a convergent region of the grid, all relevant values should change monotonic (over the refinement). The difference between the coarse and medium grid has to be larger than the difference between the medium and fine grid.
Do you have a copy of
Everything is explained in there!

crisgc November 14, 2012 13:16

Hmm.. OK, I will try to check again with three grids at different refinement stages as you've recommended me and let's see what happens.

I will also try to obtain a copy of the book.

Thank you for your help!

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28.