CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Dynamics pressure versus velocity

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 16, 2012, 06:36
Default Dynamics pressure versus velocity
Senior Member
Shamoon Jamshed
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 114
Rep Power: 8
Shamoon Jamshed is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Shamoon Jamshed
I have a problem in modelling flow over a sphere. The wall has no slip boundary condition. This means that velocity is zero. While this is shown in Fluent as zero the dynamics pressure is still giving certain value on the wall. Dynamic pressure is 0.5 rho*v*v. If v is zero on the wall why FLUENT is showing dynamics pressure on the wall. I checked both by plotting node values and cell centre values.
Shamoon Jamshed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 16, 2012, 21:16
Senior Member
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 13
LuckyTran will become famous soon enough
You are obviously correct in your interpretation. Dynamic pressure at the wall must be zero.

The reason you are getting a non-zero dynamic pressure at the wall has to do with the fact that Fluent employs a finite-volume method and data are stored at cell centers (cell centers are also sometimes called nodes, but fluent does not use this terminology).

When you ask Fluent to calculate variables at a boundary face or wall (or node values) it must interpolate/extrapolate values from the cell centers to these locations (using the spatial discretization scheme that you specified). This interpolation process allows for non-physical events to occur (resulting in non-zero dynamic pressure at the wall). This is an inherent weakness of finite-volume methods.

This does not necessarily mean that your results are garbage. Even if your solution is perfect, it can still give rise to these results. Again, it is a result of the finite-volume representation. Any other software that uses the finite-volume method can also exhibit this effect. Using different spatial discretization schemes will also change the results slightly (1st order, 2nd order, or higher order schemes); but regardless of how accurate the spatial discretization scheme is, it will not guarantee that your dynamic pressure will be 0 at the wall.
ghost82 likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2012, 08:38
Senior Member
Philipov's Avatar
Svetlin Philipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 8
Philipov is on a distinguished road
Excellent explanation and give reasons for accurate results interpretations. Just to add something. If is good to see forces on a given surface on which dynamic pressure will give effect on. This I think can help understanding the positive and negative consequences from FVM.
Philipov is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
internal flow BCs: pressure driven versus velocity driven mihaipruna OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 22 March 6, 2014 11:06
Initial pressure and transverse velocity fields to initialize turbulence model nickvinn Main CFD Forum 0 February 29, 2012 11:11
lid-driven cavity in matlab using BiCGStab Don456 Main CFD Forum 1 January 19, 2012 16:00
Channel flow: Inlet pressure AND uniform velocity? frmap1 Main CFD Forum 0 April 15, 2010 10:32
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (CFX4.2) HB &DS CFX 0 January 9, 2000 14:19

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:11.