CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

residuals still going down!

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 26, 2012, 04:27
Default residuals still going down!
  #1
Senior Member
 
christine
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: europe
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 7
yorelchr is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I'm running a case of turbogas. When I work on the "cold" case, to test the mesh, the residuals are never "plane". What could be the problem? same problem when switching on combustion.
I send you the pictures of these residuals.
http://cjoint.com/data/0KAjAQL9Y2T.htm

on which parameters should I "play" ?

thank you very much for any help

yorelchr
yorelchr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 26, 2012, 05:36
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 16
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Residuals look quite normal to me. What exactly do you think the problem is? That some residuals start jittering at 1.0e-11 or that some of the others (continuity) are not "plain"?
How many cells does your grid have? 20,000 iterations seem to be pretty much... Maybe you can get faster convergence with a different solution method.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 26, 2012, 09:42
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 899
Rep Power: 15
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by yorelchr View Post
Hello,

I'm running a case of turbogas. When I work on the "cold" case, to test the mesh, the residuals are never "plane". What could be the problem? same problem when switching on combustion.
I send you the pictures of these residuals.
http://cjoint.com/data/0KAjAQL9Y2T.htm

on which parameters should I "play" ?

thank you very much for any help

yorelchr
As RodriguezFatz writes, residuals are fine: some small variation can appear, but it is quite usual.
To see if you have a converged solution monitor some parameters (species concentration, velocity, pressure, other..) on some planes into your domain; if they don't change with successive iterations, you have a converged solution.
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2012, 17:13
Default residuals and combustion
  #4
Senior Member
 
christine
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: europe
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 7
yorelchr is on a distinguished road
thank you Rodriguez Fatz and Ghost 82 for your help and sorry to reply so late.
I thought residuals should be plane, but I monitored some variables and it seems ok.
I have another question : my geometry is extracted from a bigger one. Since the bigger one has too many cells I have cut the domain and I put profiles coming from the entire turbogas simulations and I've kept the same mesh (it has been possible since the entire geometry has been meshed by block and I kept the original blocks (except of course the ones that I have eliminated). So, the strange thing is that the first 3000 iterations, my residuals are going down, really low...then the monitoring of the variables tell me that everything is changing and after many new iterations, I obtain the same results as with the entire domain. But with the entire domain, there is no need to wait for these first 3000 iterations, the "final results" are coming quicker....so if had not the full domain, I would have stopped my simulations during the first 3000 iterations since nothing anymore was happening...so...why this difference between the full domain and the extracted one?
(at this stage, there is no combustion, it's just for testing the mesh and checking the velocity profiles)
Thanks for any clue...
yorelchr
yorelchr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2012, 08:09
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 16
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Maybe:
The equations of the reduced case differ from the complete case. Not only the full case has a larger system of equations, but also the boundary conditions are different, i.e. the bc of your reduced case lie somewhere inside your complete domain. So in one case the bc are "hard wired" to some value, whereas in the other (complete) case the same cells have to be calculated.
Also the solver will behave differently with two different sets of equations.
Then, the initialization differs and so on...
I would not be too suprised by this behavior.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tutorial of how to plot residuals ! wolle1982 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 112 June 3, 2015 07:50
under-relaxation factors -> level of residuals Zigainer FLUENT 16 April 14, 2015 23:17
what to monitor besides residuals? franzdrs FLUENT 5 March 21, 2013 04:59
Strange residuals of the Density Based Solver Pat84 FLUENT 0 October 22, 2012 15:59
Convergence - scaled vs unscaled residuals HS FLUENT 1 November 7, 2005 06:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:49.