CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Analytical and solver results not matching

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 7, 2013, 10:48
Question Analytical and solver results not matching
  #1
Member
 
Akash Chaudhari
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 3
Akash C is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I modeled flow through a straight pipe and compared results for pressure drop for various Reynold's numbers with analytical ones(obtained from Darcy Weisbach equation using suitable formula for friction factor as per Re number). Results for the turbulent flow matched for various Re and wall roughness values. But for the laminar flow the solver shows double the pressure drop obtained by analytical results for various Re.

Could anyone possibly suggest a reason for the same.
Thanks!
Akash C is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2013, 00:04
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Saeed Sadeghi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 227
Rep Power: 4
msaeedsadeghi is on a distinguished road
You should remesh the geometry for laminar flow
__________________
Regards,
Saeed Sadeghi
Ansys Fluent CFD Consultant
msaeedsadeghi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2013, 08:58
Default
  #3
Member
 
Akash Chaudhari
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 3
Akash C is on a distinguished road
By remeshing how fine do you suggest the mesh be? Can you suggest some quality parameter e.g skewness, warp, etc.

Because I tried remeshing it, but the pipe being 10 cm diameter and 1 m long, it resulted in a very large cell count leading to each iteration needing around 30-40 sec and i thought such a simple case shouldn't take so much time hence discontinued it.
Akash C is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2013, 09:04
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Marion
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: France
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 5
Marion is on a distinguished road
Hi Akash,

For a simple case like this, maybe 2D-axisymmetric could be enough?

Marion.
Marion is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2013, 10:08
Default
  #5
Member
 
Akash Chaudhari
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 3
Akash C is on a distinguished road
Hello Marion,
You are right no doubt, but I am trying to find out why it's not happening for the 3D model. Even for the 3D model I have pipe cut in half with symmetry as one of the boundary condition.

What's puzzling me is that turbulent results matched to a tee while the results for laminar are varying by constant multiple.
Akash C is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2013, 01:52
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Marion
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: France
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 5
Marion is on a distinguished road
Hi,

With 2D you can use more elements and have a much better mesh quality.
If you make a detailed 2D model first and still get wrong results then there is an issue in your modelling. If the results are good, then you can worry about 3D.

Marion.
Marion is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Integrated conjugate heat transfer solver in OpenFOAM hjasak OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 168 June 27, 2013 01:56
Solver Validation chemFoam using analytical Solution Hanzo OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 November 7, 2012 03:01
Parallel solver for Poisson equation using PETSc JackNapier Main CFD Forum 0 July 5, 2012 16:53
Difficulties with viscoelasticFluidFoam solver titio OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 March 26, 2012 10:27
TVD?Riemann Solver? Shock Capture? nashiong Main CFD Forum 11 June 23, 2010 22:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:42.