CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (
-   FLUENT (
-   -   Convection in a refrigerator (

CaglarCoskun March 1, 2013 12:28

Convection in a refrigerator

I am trying to simulate the mixed convection of the air inside of a household refrigerator cabin for my thesis. Geometry is somewhat complex (shelves, drawers, compartments etc.)

My case is transient. It includes the stops and starts of compressor of the refrigerator, so boundary conditions are time-dependent. The temperatures at certain points inside the refrigerator cabin are fluctuating with respect to the boundary conditions.

My problem is, the temperatures of numeric results are not as responsive as the experimental data. An example comparison is given in an Excel file in the link below. As you can see the plot in the file, the initial temperatures of experimental and numeric data are almost the same, but as the time passes the error between them increases. What can you suggest about this?

My settings are as follows:
Turbulence Model: Spalart - Allmaras
Boussinesq approximation is used for density changes
Pressure, Momentum, Energy and Turbulent viscosity schemes: 2. Order Upwind.
Pressure - Velocity Scheme: SIMPLE
Under - relaxation factors are default.
Time step: 10 sec.

The file is in the following link:

Thanks in advance...

CaglarCoskun March 2, 2013 15:24


Any ideas? =)

macfly March 3, 2013 14:26

Why did you choose de S-A turbulence model? Maybe you should try a 2-equations model (\kappa-\varepsilon or \kappa-\omega).

From the Fluent Theory Guide:
"The Spalart-Allmaras model was developed for aerodynamic flows. It is not calibrated for general industrial flows, and does produce relatively larger errors for some free shear flows, especially plane and round jet flows. In addition, it cannot be relied on to predict the decay of homogeneous, isotropic turbulence."

CaglarCoskun March 3, 2013 14:51

Thanks for your reply.
I have read the part about turbulence models in Theory Guide. In my problem, I did some steady simulations to validate my mesh at first. In that steady simulations, I tried Spalart - Allmaras, K - e, and K - w and their variants. However, I got the most accurate results by the Spalart - Allmaras turbulence model, so I am still going on with Spalart - Allmaras.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47.