CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Is 2-way FSI valve modeling with seperate fluid domains possible?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By stumpy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 5, 2013, 07:16
Default Is 2-way FSI valve modeling with seperate fluid domains possible?
  #1
New Member
 
Marcin K
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
Maurosso is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I have come to a more or less stand still in my work on modeling a hydraulic car shock absorber. The study includes a velocity boundary condition applied in Ansys Mechanical (workbench, not APDL) on a plate, that will in response compress the fluid, and interact with the valves in the damper.

At the moment I am doing preliminary studies, with huge simplifications to the problem, just to get the hang of Mechanical-Fluent system coupling and 2-way fsi modeling.

The problem that I have, is that all the information I've found, all the tutorials and instructions, present a solution for problems where the fluid domain is continuous.
I've made a test of concept for the whole problem by preparing a model visible on Pic1, where the horizontal bar in the middle of fluid domain was to oscillate according to the velocity boundary condition of the top bar. It was more or less successful. The "valve" indeed oscillated, and the fluid structure interface and system coupling worked nicely, I used mesh smoothing for the problem and in got the job done.

But here's the catch. On the final model (no yet ready), the valves will be closed on the first steps, basically creating 2 non-continuous, fluid domains. The problem is schematically shown in Pic2, where the gray bar in the middle would be a fixed solid, and the pink bar would "ease" and open downwards under the rising pressure induced by the movement of the top plate.

So...here are my questions: Is it possible to prepare such an study? Where at the first few steps, the fluid domains are separated by a solidbody, but after large enough deformation of the solid, the flow begins between the two domains? Could you provide me with some information on such modeling, or point to towards some literature or tutorials on the subject?

If not possible in any way with fluent-mechanical system coupling-> What methods, tricks, tips, ways, would to suggest to explore to prepare such an analysis.

Regards,
Martin K.

Pic1:

Pic2:
Maurosso is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2013, 12:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 13
stumpy is on a distinguished road
You would need to have a very small gap at the right end of the "valve", so the two fluid domains are connected. The challenge will then be to avoid the mesh collapsing or becoming too skewed at the valve opens. There'll be some leakage when the valve is "closed" due to the gap. There's no easy way to deal with that.
Gowrav likes this.
stumpy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2013, 14:41
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Marcin K
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
Maurosso is on a distinguished road
Well...ok, that might work for this example (even thou slightly, as modeling a valve that you know is leaking...is no fun... ).

You said that there are no easy ways to deal with it, are there difficult ones? Or should I focus on preparing a model of the whole valve assembly with micro and mini leaks? I believe meshing and setting up the dynamic mesh will be a huge pain in the butt...
Are, for example, heart valves modeled this way?
When modeling combustion in a cylinder with intake and outtake valves included, those analisis sort of do it right, and no leakaged was to be spotted, unless they hid it in post-procesing.

Sorry for my abnouxious questions...It's just that, as I've said, I am at a stand still, and don't know whether to change the whole idea behind the subject, do some tinkering with it (as you suggested: micro leaks etc), or dig deeper for other possibilities.
Maurosso is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2013, 17:17
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 13
stumpy is on a distinguished road
The difficult way to stop the leaks is use a UDF to identify the cells in the gap and then introduce a porous loss or momentum sink to block the flow. Identifying the cells is the difficult part. The latest version of Fluent has a contact detection model that does exactly this, but you can't use it with System Coupling yet.
I'm not sure what IC engines do in this situation.
stumpy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 7, 2013, 09:56
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Marcin K
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
Maurosso is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your reply, I will try my best to resolve the subject using the "gaps" solution and dynamic meshing, as I have no experience with UDF's or C programing...thou maybe it's time to dig into that

Again, thank you stumpy for your help
Maurosso is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modeling heat transfer fluid to solid Elvis1991 FLUENT 6 December 7, 2012 10:08
how to extend FSI 2D codes to 3D, need advises abouziar Main CFD Forum 1 May 30, 2008 04:08
multi fluid domains with differ. physical charact. John Walker CFX 5 April 15, 2006 22:32
Help on Fluid dynamic modeling kdk Main CFD Forum 0 May 27, 2002 06:01
Help With Modeling A Projectile Fluid In Flight. Dzeff G. Main CFD Forum 0 December 10, 1998 22:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42.