CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Axisymmetric 2D mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 2, 2013, 21:03
Default Axisymmetric 2D mesh
  #1
New Member
 
Chris
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
Sieben is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have been doing 2D simulations of a axisymmetric geometry, but the outer flow field is not symmetric, and furthermore, the directions of inlet & outlet are set perpendicular to the axis (x axis).


I' d like to know whether I can use the axisymmetric model.

Thanks.
Sieben is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2013, 23:43
Default
  #2
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,258
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 43
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
few pics would certainly help to pin-point problem...
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 02:09
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Chris
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
Sieben is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the replay. I've sent two pics with bc.

micro.png

macro.jpg
Sieben is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 02:27
Default
  #4
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,258
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 43
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
there is no outlet?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 02:58
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Chris
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
Sieben is on a distinguished road
outlet bc is the right side
Sieben is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 05:57
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 12
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
You mention that you want to use axisymmetric model. In this mesh, where is the axis of revolution?

If I am not missing something, it is not possible to use your mesh as axisymmetric since all the edges are given boundary conditions. You can't revolve around an edge with a boundary condition since that edge would be an axis (line) in the real geometry and a line can't be an inlet or outlet for most of the cases.

OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 06:15
Default
  #7
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,258
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 43
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
half model may serve as axi-symmetric...
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 07:02
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 12
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Quote:
half model may serve as axi-symmetric...
I'm intrigued and a bit surprised. If you take a case of FLUENT, you can't have any domain below X-axis, in axisymmetric case. How would you create a half axisymmetric planar model with X-axis at the center, which would have half of the domain below X axis, generating negative volume when revolved around X axis?

More importantly, why would one bother to do that, since it would suffice to keep a single planar domain with axis at one of the edges?

Or are you talking about a half 3D model? That would be symmetric about the middle plane, but not axisymmetric since it may have gradients in theta-direction.

OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 07:10
Default
  #9
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,258
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 43
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
OJ

I was not talking about the this particular model.

If we can rotate this model -90 about Z-axis (Z out of screen) and translate so that this model is on + x-axis. and X-axis is crossing through centre of this model. After that we can delete lower part (-Y) and model it as axi-symetric.

what do you think?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 07:12
Default
  #10
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,258
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 43
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
OJ

I was not talking about the this particular model.

If we can rotate this model -90 about Z-axis (Z out of screen) and translate so that this model is on + x-axis. and X-axis is crossing through centre of this model. After that we can delete lower part (-Y) and model it as axi-symetric.

what do you think?

I notice one thing that flow is not axi-symtric! May be you can try with quarter model or half.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 07:58
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 12
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Quote:
I was not talking about the this particular model.
Neither was I. I was just commenting on your earlier comment that half planar model can be considered axisymmetric, which doesn't seem plausible

It is still not entirely clear where his X-axis is. If we assume his X-axis is vertical and passes through middle of his wallled voids, it is evident that it is not even geometrically symmetrical about X-axis.

Moreover, if you have a look at his boundary conditions, he has three inlets at three edges of rectangle (top, bottom, left) and the fourth edge (right) is outlet. This is strange. This can not even be a cylindrical representation as there can not be an axis and and an axial flow. Only 3D domain he can represented using this is a cuboidal one, with his current 2D plane specified as symmetry.

Sieben, can you confirm if boundary conditions are right and specify location of X, Y axis? Also is the final domain cylindrical or cuboidal?

OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2013, 09:19
Default
  #12
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,258
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 43
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
OJ

You comments are logical and correct.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 6, 2013, 21:06
Default
  #13
New Member
 
Chris
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
Sieben is on a distinguished road
Hi, thanks for the reply.

Maybe Ive given an ambiguous description. I've sent two pics again.

I wonder whether I can use the 2d axisymmetric model when the inlet & outlet boundaries are vertical to the axis.

Thanks again.

macro.png

micro.jpg
Sieben is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 7, 2013, 02:46
Default
  #14
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,258
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 43
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
It looks like a turbine secondary air passage...

I think you can try it in fluent...
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 7, 2013, 13:10
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 12
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Alright, something fishy. If your top condition is outlet, left and right being inlet, the axisymmetric assumption doesn't seem to hold.

Visualize this - your actual domain is a cylinder with an axis as the one you specified and the revolution section being your domain. Going by your current configuration, your cylinder will have flat surfaces as inlets and curved surfaces as outlet! It is not bounded. IF I am not missing something, I can't imagine how it would fit in the axisymmetric assumption.

OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
2d simulation, axisymmetric, fluent

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Star CCM Overset Mesh Error (Rotating Turbine) thezack CD-adapco 4 April 26, 2016 02:03
No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 6 August 26, 2015 09:38
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 13 January 22, 2014 05:11
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors DarrenC ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 11 August 5, 2013 06:42
snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 March 27, 2011 21:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14.