|April 8, 2013, 12:46||
Comparaison inviscid 3D Fluent/CFX/Xflr5/"in-house" code
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6Rep Power: 5
I'm working on 3D CFD analysis of an airfoil and I compared the results obtained with several different codes.
That's my results for the aerodynamic coefficients :
mach = 0.10
alfa = 0
CL = 0.1357 (in-house code)
CL = 0.0548 (CFX)
CL = 0.0662 (Fluent)
CL = 0.1308 (XFLR5)
CM = -8.5438E-02 (in-house code)
CM = +2.2879E-02 (CFX)
CM = +3.3578E-02 (Fluent)
CM = -8.9100E-02 (XFLR5)
I don't understand why there is such a difference between Fluent's and Xflr5's results for an inviscid study.
I used the same mesh for the study with CFX and Fluent.
If someone can help me, it will be very appreciate. If you need more explanation, please ask me.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|The FOAM Documentation Project - SHUT-DOWN||holger_marschall||OpenFOAM||242||March 7, 2013 13:30|
|Debugging Unsteady 2-D Panel Method Code: Wake Modeling||RajeshAero||Main CFD Forum||5||November 10, 2011 06:48|
|Small 3-D code||Zdravko Stojanovic||Main CFD Forum||2||July 19, 2010 10:11|
|Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach #||Axel Rohde||Main CFD Forum||1||November 19, 2001 13:19|
|own Code vs. commercial code||Bernhard Mueck||Main CFD Forum||10||February 16, 2000 11:07|