CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Error and Divergence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 9, 2013, 07:28
Default Error and Divergence
  #1
New Member
 
Roopa
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
ouce_2930 is on a distinguished road
We are doing a simulation of a 2-phase nozzle(air-glassbeads) in fluent..
The error we got is floating point exception , Temperature limited to 1 in 997 cells on one zone ,one domain ....
Reversed flow in 12 faces on pressure outlet 7...etc etc
We entered the value of outlet pressure as 101325 pascal and inlet is 395900 pascal...Flow selected is laminar
Also tell us whats the significance of solution controls and what are the values that can be given and wats the significance of relaxation factors in this problem we used default values..
As of now we are gettin divergent solution
ouce_2930 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2013, 07:55
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 12
vasava will become famous soon enough
The floating point error is due to divergence. The warning of reversed flow is common as you are specifying pressure and not the direction of velocity on the boundary. By the way How big is your domain? You have a pressure drop of almost 4 atm. What exactly are you simulating?
vasava is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2013, 05:49
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Roopa
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
ouce_2930 is on a distinguished road
We are doing a simulation of a CD nozzle in which we use air and glassbeads are the phases..Can you elaborate what exactly does domain mean ??
And we are facing one more problem where when we look at the plots of velocity the air velocity is showing some plot where as glass beads velocity is remaining constant in that plot.. That means it is not taking glass beads into the account
What may be the problem and what changes should be made so that we get plot for glass beads velocity even??
ouce_2930 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2013, 06:44
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,066
Rep Power: 15
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
"Domain" means "setup" or "experiment" here.
You should not think about any strange results you get since your solution does not converge.

It sounds quite unusual that you have a pressure drop of 3 atm but your flow is laminar. With a domain of moderate size you will get huge velocities with such a pressure drop.
Please post pictures of your geometry and you mesh and show where your outlets and inlets are!
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2013, 09:24
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Roopa
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
ouce_2930 is on a distinguished road
FFF.jpg

air-inlet.jpg


These are the attachments... We are going with turbulent flow( k-epsilon) where the solution got converged but the problem is the glass beads were not taken into account by the processosor. We gave all the boundary conditions for mixture but its only taking air in the mixture.
ouce_2930 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2013, 09:35
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,066
Rep Power: 15
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by ouce_2930 View Post
These are the attachments...
What...!?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2013, 02:08
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Roopa
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
ouce_2930 is on a distinguished road
sorry v dint check upon d pics... here r d pics of the geometry and mesh
the left edge is the inlet
and the right edge is the outlet

geometry.jpg

mesh.jpg
ouce_2930 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2013, 05:47
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 10
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
It is never robust to specify just pressure values at inlet and outlet. It's preferable to use a quantifiable flow (mass flow rate/velocity etc) for a more stable setup.

Why do you need to simulate only converging-diverging portion of nozzle, why not extend it to few pipe diameter before and after the nozzle? This should be helpful in mitigating backflow. This will use fully developed flow before coming into nozzle giving a more accurate represenation.

Are you sure mixture model is setup properly? Have you had a go at the tutorials on this?

OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30.