|
[Sponsors] |
January 9, 2017, 06:42 |
Conjugate heat transfer, interface and walls
|
#1 |
New Member
saimen
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Dear CFD community
I have been struggling with a coupled heat transfer problem for quite a while now and tried to look for a solution in your forums but could not find any answer. For simplicity, my model contains a tube (solid domain) with water (fluid domain) flowing on the inside at laminar conditions. I defined the geometries and created a contact between the inner tube surface and outer water surface before generating the mesh. When I want to setup up my solution, I have a src and trg interface for both domains. I can make a coupled wall by selecting these two interfaces and ANSYS automatically creates 4 new boundary conditions: - side1-wall-contact-src (wall) -> can choose BC - side2-wall-contact-trg (wall) -> can choose BC - wall1-1-1 (wall) -> coupled selected - wall1-1-1-shadow (wall) -> coupled selected My question now is, why does ANSYS create 4 new walls? I would just like to have coupled heat transfer across the interfaces. However, I also have to set BCs for the src and trg walls but I only know the outside surface temperature of the pipe and have no information on the heat flux. Does ANSYS need a HTC as input or can it calculate this value directly from correlations using flow conditions and thermal properties? In case I need to insert a HTC, which wall should I choose (src, trg or both)? I would be very glad to have some answers. Maybe I got confused with some stuff and hope some of you could help me with the understanding. Best Regards! -saimen |
|
January 10, 2017, 11:47 |
|
#2 |
New Member
saimen
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
I think I found the solution. Before creating the mesh, I have to select all bodies in the DesignModeler, right click and "form body". Now when I create the mesh and go to the setup procedure, I see a wall and shadow wall for both domains. They are already defined as coupled and this seems to work.
One other question: When I want to include S2S radiation, which wall do i have to choose for the view factor calculations, the shadow walls or normal walls? Because I can only change the emissivity in the shadow walls, so I used those for the view factor calculation. Best, saimen |
|
January 11, 2017, 04:33 |
|
#3 |
Member
Dmitry Volkind
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ekaterinburg, Russia
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi, Saimen!
S2S model works in fluid domains only, so you don't have to care about solid side of the coupled wall. But fluid side is not always "shadow" - that's geometry dependent. To tell which wall is which you can simply judge by available BC settings. There is also a text box in the BC menu, indicating its neighboring cell zone. |
|
January 11, 2017, 04:44 |
|
#4 |
New Member
saimen
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi dvolkind,
Thanks for your quick reply! I was thinking about the same thing, but someone posted a long time ago that you don't have to include shadow-walls. But that is really geometry dependent! Regards, saimen |
|
April 12, 2017, 00:44 |
Heat transfer coefficient
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Dear Sir,
I have to calculate the inner heat transfer coefficient of a helical coil inside which cold water is flowing. I have created the geometry in Gambit. Kindly help me with the steps to carry out the heat transfer process in Fluent. Thank you. |
|
August 15, 2019, 04:54 |
|
#6 |
New Member
zhou tong
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Step 1. On mesh step, u should specify the connects. (automatically will connects,connects1, connects2...)
Step 2, On Setup/ solution. if solid-fluid interface, it will have different name, like wall-1,wall-2,etc Step 3, go to mesh interfaces, delete the old interfaces and create new interface, u should choose' coupled' or "mapped" (same thing, just mapped is more robust). Step 4, it will automatically create 4 walls, (2 shadows and 2 normals), the two shadows u just need set as coupled, and 2 noramls set the bc (generally u dont need set anything to it, it will automatically calucalte, if zero thickness, it will perfect conduction). |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conjugate Heat Transfer: Wall Heat Flux at Coupled Walls? | MaxHeat | FLUENT | 4 | September 14, 2017 10:44 |
Problem in setting Boundary Condition | Madhatter92 | CFX | 12 | January 12, 2016 04:39 |
Heat Flux at Internal walls or Fluid Solid Interface | Mahi | CFX | 3 | October 1, 2012 02:18 |
Conjugate heat transfer and radiation modeling questions | shankara.2 | FLUENT | 0 | April 21, 2009 15:55 |
modeling interface in conjugate heat transfer | Vivek | FLUENT | 5 | October 12, 2007 05:43 |