|June 29, 2013, 09:26||
Suggestions to improve result
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 32Rep Power: 3
i'm here to ask for suggestions to improve the results of the following simulation.
I'm trying to do a validation, using the experimental data found in:
"Near wall characterization of the flow over a two-dimensional steep smooth hill", J. B. R. Loureiro Æ F. T. Pinho Æ A. P. Silva Freire
the inlet velocity profile, and the inlet turbulence profile are shown in the first attachment.
The simulation setup is the following:
Models: Standard k-epsilon with Enanced wall function.
inlet: velocity-inlet, with user definied function for velocity and turbulent kinetic energy.
In the second attachment you can see the yplus for the ground surface, hence i've used the Enhanced wall treatment option.
In the last attachment you see the velocity profiles (normalized in respect to the hill height). The simulation is able to "capture" the "trends" of the experimental data, but there are some significative variations.
What can i do to improve the results?
Thank you very much.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Difference of result betn Fluent & CFX simulation for S2S radiation||njundale||Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming||0||November 6, 2012 00:35|
|How to display the whole result of a periodic model via one period result?||dixylo||FLUENT||2||February 23, 2012 04:11|
|Accuracy problem of HO schemes on unstructured mesh, HO scheme gives 1st order result||gemini||Main CFD Forum||12||December 27, 2011 21:01|
|Low pressure result in low velocity region for RNG-ke?||Gabbee90||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||0||July 14, 2011 20:48|
|Problem in Result of the pressure coefficient||Ken Choi||Main CFD Forum||2||March 15, 1999 04:15|