CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Defining Density

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 18, 2013, 16:45
Default Defining Density
  #1
New Member
 
Bradley Rautenbach
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 3
Bradley R is on a distinguished road
Hi Everyone


I am new to fluent and I am currently busy with my honors project on a solar car. I am using air for my fluid domain with the temperature set to 298 K and pressure of 101325 Pa. In my boundary conditions I am using the pressure far field option. I am also using a density based solver and ideal gas law for air. When I set my reference values based on the pressure far field, it is giving me a density of 2.37 kg/m3 for the air. This means that I am getting a very high drag force and I'm not sure if this affects my Cd during computation?

I am also using k-epsilon as my solver. Is it necessary to check solver independence because my results with k-omega are quite different.

Why is it giving me such a high density as the reference value?

Also would you suggest using pressure based for speeds of 120km/h although air is compressible?

I would appreciate any ones help. Thank You


Bradley
Bradley R is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2013, 21:50
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 315
Rep Power: 11
blackmask will become famous soon enough
Can the car run so fast that the compressibility come into play?

You can see that 120 km/h is approximately 33 m/s, or a Mach number around 0.1 at the temperature you give. In most cases the flow can be regarded to be incompressible as long as Mach number does not exceed 0.3. The exceptions can be some quasi one-dimensional flow where shock formed at low Mach number such as the movement of piston.

Why simply use the incompressible model?

BTW, do you know how does FLUENT handle the pressure far field condition? This type of b.c. is handy for some of wind tunnel experiments but I do not believe that you could figure out how to specify the parameters for this b.c. easily.
blackmask is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2013, 03:00
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Bradley Rautenbach
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 3
Bradley R is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your response.

The reason I looked into density based is because there are quite a few curves on the underside of the car with the wheel bays and the sitting position. I thought that this may cause the air to compress. It is probably not significant.
Where would be the best place to find a solid reason which I can reference as to why I am using one over the other?


The pressure far field I have applied the flow in the one direction however I am also doing cross wind analysis so I will be applying a cross wind. How would I apply a velocity inlet and outlet? Would that be a better option and why if I may ask?
Bradley R is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2013, 03:19
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Bradley Rautenbach
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 3
Bradley R is on a distinguished road
Sorry I had forgotten. I actually tried pressure based first and I was getting divergence.
Bradley R is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2013, 05:11
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 315
Rep Power: 11
blackmask will become famous soon enough
You should try to extend your computational domain to appropriate size and use the combination of velocity inlet + pressure outlet. That is a robust combination for incompressible outer-flow aerodynamics.
blackmask is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
car, car aerodynamics, density, fluent 14.5, solar car

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current density visualisation (PEM fuel cell add-on module) pchoopanya FLUENT 2 January 20, 2014 06:14
A problem about density in liquid air definition alloveyou CFX 2 June 14, 2012 15:20
REAL GAS UDF brian FLUENT 6 September 11, 2006 09:23
Warning 097- AB CD-adapco 6 November 15, 2004 05:41
UDF file for defining density as fn of pressure anton FLUENT 8 November 11, 2003 10:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:01.