CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

convergence criteria in Fluent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By flotus1
  • 1 Post By flotus1

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 22, 2013, 02:16
Default convergence criteria in Fluent
  #1
Member
 
Harry
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 4
star is on a distinguished road
Hello friends. I just started to work on Fluent 14.0. I am learning it to simulate flow around a 2D airfoil. I want to ask a basic question.
How will we know that solution has converged? Is it depend on the value of Residuals which we set? and if it converges, it means the solution is correct?
I will thankful if somebody help me.
star is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2013, 04:46
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,098
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
In the case of an airfoil, it might be reasonable to judge convergence rather on lift and drag coefficients than on the residuals alone.

And of course, a conveged solution is not necessarily a correct one due to the multitude of possible error sources in a simulation.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2013, 05:55
Default
  #3
Member
 
Harry
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 4
star is on a distinguished road
Thanks Alex for your kind reply. So you mean that I should check the stability of lift and drag coefficients? In the case of converged solution, could you please tell me some of the error sources or how to make sure the converged solution is correct?
I know about one thing, i.e to change the grid size and check the result with previous grid size. If the difference is very small so it means it is correct? Is it correct way or there are others?
star is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2013, 08:39
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,098
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F
star likes this.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2013, 12:48
Default
  #5
Member
 
Harry
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 4
star is on a distinguished road
Thanks Alex.. i got another question out of it if you could help.
it says" Usage errors are caused by user specifications. For example, the user may run a turbulent simulation as laminar or an unsteady simulation as steady. These errors can be monitored via a convergence study."
What I know is laminar and turbulent flow depends on Reynolds no. but how will we know about steady and unsteady flow? how can we know from convergence?
star is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2013, 13:59
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,098
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
This point might be a little confusing in the FAQ. I actually think the conclusion that user errors can be monitored with a convergence study is questionable.

But let us first review the terminology: steady/unsteady is not equivalent to laminar/turbulent.
Turbulent flows are always unsteady.
Laminar flows can be steady or unsteady.

The most important thing to tell if a flow is turbulent or not: Technical flows are mostly turbulent flows. Apart from this, the exact regions of laminar and turbulent flow regime are only known for very simple flows.
It might be a good idea to start off a simulation with a turbulence model and monitor turbulent quantities like the turbulent kinetic energy k. If it is very low throughout the computational domain (provided low values at the inlet) you might run a laminar computation. If this converges well, the flow might actually be laminar.
But again, other factors like numerical viscosity introduced by a first order upwind scheme might force the flow to be laminar in the computation while it is actually turbulent...
star likes this.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Divergence problem for species transport model MY FLUENT 3 January 11, 2014 05:46
Floating point error and divergence detected aannjj FLUENT 0 July 2, 2013 03:44
Divergence problem Smaras FLUENT 13 February 21, 2013 06:03
3d vof Smaras FLUENT 2 February 19, 2013 07:58
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition SamCanuck FLUENT 2 August 31, 2011 11:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35.